[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5731D1DF.5050304@ti.com>
Date: Tue, 10 May 2016 15:19:43 +0300
From: Tomi Valkeinen <tomi.valkeinen@...com>
To: Sebastian Reichel <sre@...nel.org>,
Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>,
Aaro Koskinen <aaro.koskinen@....fi>
CC: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com>,
David Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>, <linux-omap@...r.kernel.org>,
<dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 18/23] drm: omapdrm: panel-dsi-cm: use threaded irq
handler
On 08/03/16 18:39, Sebastian Reichel wrote:
> Use threaded irq handler for the tearing effect gpio,
> since it updates the display content, which requires
> too much time for a fastpath irq.
>
> Signed-off-by: Sebastian Reichel <sre@...nel.org>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/omapdrm/displays/panel-dsi-cm.c | 6 +++---
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/omapdrm/displays/panel-dsi-cm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/omapdrm/displays/panel-dsi-cm.c
> index 768e92d1ec8b..8316b6c2d8aa 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/omapdrm/displays/panel-dsi-cm.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/omapdrm/displays/panel-dsi-cm.c
> @@ -1317,9 +1317,9 @@ static int dsicm_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> return r;
> }
>
> - r = devm_request_irq(dev, gpio_to_irq(ddata->ext_te_gpio),
> - dsicm_te_isr,
> - IRQF_TRIGGER_RISING,
> + r = devm_request_threaded_irq(dev, gpio_to_irq(ddata->ext_te_gpio),
> + NULL, dsicm_te_isr,
> + IRQF_TRIGGER_RISING | IRQF_ONESHOT,
> "taal vsync", ddata);
>
> if (r) {
>
I don't have a problem with moving to threaded irq, but it does make me
wonder, what's happening there that's taking so much time? I think it
should be just writing the configs to the registers and starting the
transfer.
Tomi
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (820 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists