| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <20160510132055.GU2890@piout.net>
Date: Tue, 10 May 2016 15:20:55 +0200
From: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...e-electrons.com>
To: venkat.prashanth2498@...il.com
Cc: a.zummo@...ertech.it, rtc-linux@...glegroups.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, marcus.folkesson@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] rtc: add support to maxim rtc max6916 v2.0
Hi,
Again, please use checkpatch.pl --strict before sending a patch.
On 06/05/2016 at 02:16:04 -0700, venkat.prashanth2498@...il.com wrote :
> From: venkat-prashanth <venkat.prashanth2498@...il.com>
>
> This is a patch to add
> support for maxim rtc MAX6916
>
> Signed-off-by : Venkat Prashanth B U <venkat.prashanth2498@...il.com>
> ---
The changelog should appear here, not in a separate file.
> Kconfig | 10 ++++
> changeLOG | 36 ++++++++++++
> rtc-max6916.c | 172 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
You are missing modifications in the Makefile.
> 3 files changed, 218 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/rtcKconfig b/drivers/rtc/Kconfig
> index e69de29..81aaa1e 100644
> --- a/drivers/rtc/Kconfig
> +++ b/drivers/rtc/Kconfig
> @@ -0,0 +1,10 @@
> +config RTC_DRV_MAX6916
> +tristate "Maxim MAX6916"
> +
> +help
> +If you say yes here you get support for the
> +Maxim MAX6916 chips.
> +This driver only supports the RTC feature, and not other chip
> +features such as alarms.
> +This driver can also be built as a module. If so, the module
> +will be called rtc‐max6916.
This is badly indented.
> diff --git a/changeLOG b/changeLOG
> index e69de29..6aa0a76 100644
> --- a/drivers/rtc/changeLOG
> +++ b/drivers/rtc/changeLOG
> @@ -0,0 +1,36 @@
> +Changes incorporated after pre-commit review
> +
> +1./*created folders
> +drivers/rtc/rtc-max6916.c
> +drivers/rtc/Kconfig/
> +
> +2./*deleted the port i/o's since it does not add
> +any significance in overall system design aspect*/
> +/*
> +#define ADDRESS_REG 0x70
> +#define DATA_REG 0x71
> +#define ADDRESS_REG_MASK 0xe0
> +
> +static unsigned char get_rtc(unsigned char addr)
> +{
> +outb(addr, ADDRESS_REG);
> +return inb(DATA_REG);
> +}*/
> +
> +3./* Clock burst value is modified from 0X00 to 0X3F and
> +further get_rtc() function is replaced with bcd2bin()
> +since the time in Linux is in binary format so the conversion is done*/
> +
> +
> +4./*enforced the year range instead of accepting any value
> +which is as follows:
> +/* starting from year 2000,limit to 100 years from now
> +that is subtract the year by 100 */
> +dt->tm_year = dt->tm_year % 100;
> +if(dt->tm_year >= 100)
> +dt->tm_year -= 100;
> +
> +if (dt->tm_year < 100 || dt->tm_year > 199) {
> + dev_err(&spi->dev, "Year must be between 2000 and 2099. It's %d.\n",dt->tm_year + 1900);
> + return -EINVAL;
> +}*/
> diff --git a/drivers/rtc/rtc-max6916.c b/drivers/rtc/rtc-max6916.c
> index e69de29..f5e396f 100644
> --- a/drivers/rtc/rtc-max6916.c
> +++ b/drivers/rtc/rtc-max6916.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,172 @@
> +/* rtc-max6916.c
> + *
> + * Driver for MAXIM max6916 Low Current, SPI Compatible
> + * Real Time Clock
> + *
> + * Author : Venkat Prashanth B U <venkat.prashanth2498@...il.com>
> + *
> + * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify
> + * it under the terms of the GNU General Public License version 2 as
> + * published by the Free Software Foundation.
> + *
> + */
> +
> +#include <linux/init.h>
> +#include <linux/module.h>
> +#include <linux/device.h>
> +#include <linux/platform_device.h>
> +#include <linux/rtc.h>
> +#include <linux/spi/spi.h>
> +#include <linux/bcd.h>
> +
> +/* Registers in max6916 rtc */
> +
> +#define MAX6916_SECONDS_REG 0x01
> +#define MAX6916_MINUTES_REG 0x02
> +#define MAX6916_HOURS_REG 0x03
> +#define MAX6916_DATE_REG 0x04
> +#define MAX6916_MONTH_REG 0x05
> +#define MAX6916_DAY_REG 0x06
> +#define MAX6916_YEAR_REG 0x07
> +#define MAX6916_CONTROL_REG 0x08
> +#define MAX6916_STATUS_REG 0x0C
> +#define MAX6916_CLOCK_BURST 0x3F
> +
> +static int max6916_read_reg(struct device *dev, unsigned char address,
> + unsigned char *data)
> +{
> + struct spi_device *spi = to_spi_device(dev);
> +
> + *data = address | 0x80;
> +
> + return spi_write_then_read(spi, data, 1, data, 1);
> +}
> +
> +static int max6916_write_reg(struct device *dev, unsigned char address,
> + unsigned char data)
> +{
> + struct spi_device *spi = to_spi_device(dev);
> + unsigned char buf[2];
> +
> + buf[0] = address&0x7F;
> + buf[1] = data;
> +
> + return spi_write_then_read(spi, buf, 2, NULL, 0);
> +}
> +
> +static int max6916_read_time(struct device *dev, struct rtc_time *dt)
> +{
> + struct spi_device *spi = to_spi_device(dev);
> + int err;
> + unsigned char buf[8];
> +
> + buf[0] = MAX6916_CLOCK_BURST | 0x80;
> +
> + err = spi_write_then_read(spi, buf, 1, buf, 8);
> + if (err)
> + return err;
> +
> + dt->tm_sec = bcd2bin(buf[0]);
> + dt->tm_min = bcd2bin(buf[1]);
> + dt->tm_hour = bcd2bin(buf[2] & 0x3F);
> + dt->tm_mday = bcd2bin(buf[3]);
> + dt->tm_mon = bcd2bin(buf[4]) - 1;
> + dt->tm_wday = bcd2bin(buf[5]) - 1;
> + dt->tm_year = bcd2bin(buf[6]) + 100;
> +
> + return rtc_valid_tm(dt);
> +}
> +
> +static int max6916_set_time(struct device *dev, struct rtc_time *dt)
> +{
> + struct spi_device *spi = to_spi_device(dev);
> + unsigned char buf[9];
> +
> + buf[0] = MAX6916_CLOCK_BURST & 0x7F;
> + buf[1] = bin2bcd(dt->tm_sec);
> + buf[2] = bin2bcd(dt->tm_min);
> + buf[3] = (bin2bcd(dt->tm_hour)& 0X3F);
> + buf[4] = bin2bcd(dt->tm_mday);
> + buf[5] = bin2bcd(dt->tm_mon + 1);
> + buf[6] = bin2bcd(dt->tm_wday + 1);
> +
> + /* starting from year 2000,limit to 100 years
> + from now that is subtract the year by 100 */
> + dt->tm_year = dt->tm_year % 100;
This is unnecessary
> + if(dt->tm_year >= 100)
You don't need that test if the range is properly enforced.
> + dt->tm_year -= 100;
> +
> + if (dt->tm_year < 100 || dt->tm_year > 199) {
> + dev_err(&spi->dev,"Year must be between 2000 and 2099. It's %d.\n", dt->tm_year + 1900);
> + return -EINVAL;
> + }
This test should go at the beginning of the function.
> +
> + buf[7] = bin2bcd(dt->tm_year);
> + buf[8] = bin2bcd(0x00);
> +
> + /* write the rtc settings */
> + return spi_write_then_read(spi, buf, 9, NULL, 0);
> +}
> +
> +static const struct rtc_class_ops max6916_rtc_ops = {
> + .read_time = max6916_read_time,
> + .set_time = max6916_set_time,
> +};
> +
> +static int max6916_probe(struct spi_device *spi)
> +{
> + struct rtc_device *rtc;
> + unsigned char data;
> + int res;
> +
> + /* spi setup with max6916 in mode 3 and bits per word as 8 */
> + spi->mode = SPI_MODE_3;
> + spi->bits_per_word = 8;
> + spi_setup(spi);
> +
> + /* RTC Settings */
> + res = max6916_read_reg(&spi->dev, MAX6916_SECONDS_REG , &data);
> +
> + if (res)
> + return res;
> +
> + /* Disable the write protect of rtc */
> + max6916_read_reg(&spi->dev, MAX6916_CONTROL_REG, &data);
> + data = data & ~(1<<7);
Please use defines instead of magic values
> + max6916_write_reg(&spi->dev, MAX6916_CONTROL_REG, data);
> +
> + /*Enable the oscillator,disable the oscillator stop flag, and glitch filter to reduce current consumption*/
> + max6916_read_reg(&spi->dev, MAX6916_STATUS_REG, &data);
> + data = data & 0x1B;
Also use a define instead of 0x1B.
--
Alexandre Belloni, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering
http://free-electrons.com
Powered by blists - more mailing lists