linux-kernel - Re: [RFC PATCH 12/21] reset: uniphier: add core support for UniPhier reset driver

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 10 May 2016 15:54:57 +0200
From:	Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@...gutronix.de>
To:	Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@...ionext.com>
Cc:	linux-clk@...r.kernel.org, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
	Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>,
	Kalle Valo <kvalo@...eaurora.org>,
	Jiri Slaby <jslaby@...e.com>,
	Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@....samsung.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 12/21] reset: uniphier: add core support for
 UniPhier reset driver

Am Dienstag, den 10.05.2016, 18:50 +0900 schrieb Masahiro Yamada:
[...]
> +static int uniphier_reset_update(struct reset_controller_dev *rcdev,
> +				 unsigned long id, bool assert)
> +{
> +	struct uniphier_reset_priv *priv = to_uniphier_reset_priv(rcdev);
> +	const struct uniphier_reset_data *p;
> +	bool handled = false;
> +
> +	for (p = priv->data; p->id != UNIPHIER_RESET_ID_END; p++) {
> +		unsigned int val;
> +		int ret;
> +
> +		if (p->id != id)
> +			continue;
> +
> +		val = p->deassert_val;
> +		if (assert)
> +			val = ~val;
> +
> +		ret = regmap_write_bits(priv->regmap, p->reg, p->mask, val);

What is the difference between mask and deassert_val? Couldn't you just
assign
	val = assert ? 0 : p->mask;
?

> +static const struct reset_control_ops uniphier_reset_ops = {
> +	.assert = uniphier_reset_assert,
> +	.deassert = uniphier_reset_deassert,
> +	.status = uniphier_reset_status,
> +};
> +
> +int uniphier_reset_probe(struct platform_device *pdev,
> +			 const struct uniphier_reset_data *data)
> +{
> +	struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
> +	struct uniphier_reset_priv *priv;
> +	const struct uniphier_reset_data *p;
> +	struct regmap *regmap;
> +	unsigned int nr_resets = 0;
> +
> +	/* parent should be MFD and syscon node */
> +	regmap = syscon_node_to_regmap(dev->parent->of_node);
> +	if (IS_ERR(regmap)) {
> +		dev_err(dev, "failed to get regmap\n");

syscon_node_to_regmap can return different error codes. It might be
helpful to use
	dev_err(dev, "failed to get regmap: %d\n", PTR_ERR(regmap));
here.

regards
Philipp