[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20160510.115138.1825421050410315543.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Tue, 10 May 2016 11:51:38 -0400 (EDT)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: eric.dumazet@...il.com
Cc: pabeni@...hat.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org, edumazet@...gle.com,
jiri@...lanox.com, daniel@...earbox.net, ast@...mgrid.com,
aduyck@...antis.com, tom@...bertland.com, peterz@...radead.org,
mingo@...nel.org, riel@...hat.com, hannes@...essinduktion.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 0/2] net: threadable napi poll loop
From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
Date: Tue, 10 May 2016 07:29:50 -0700
> We already have ksoftirqd to normally cope with the case you are
> describing.
>
> If it is not working as intended, please identify the bugs and fix them,
> instead of adding yet another tests in fast path and extra complexity in
> the stack.
+1
Indeed, if ksoftirqd is not doing it's job, please fix it. It is designed
exactly to deal with the problems described here.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists