linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v1 1/2] dmaengine: slave means at least one of DMA_SLAVE, DMA

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20160510161356.GJ2274@localhost>
Date:	Tue, 10 May 2016 21:43:57 +0530
From:	Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@...el.com>
To:	Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, dmaengine@...r.kernel.org,
	Peter Hurley <peter@...leysoftware.com>,
	linux-serial@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 1/2] dmaengine: slave means at least one of DMA_SLAVE,
 DMA_CYCLIC

On Tue, May 10, 2016 at 07:01:03PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Tue, 2016-05-10 at 21:26 +0530, Vinod Koul wrote:
> > On Wed, May 04, 2016 at 10:29:39PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > > 
> > > When check for capabilities recognize slave support by eother
> > > DMA_SLAVE or
> > 							^^^^^^^
> > typo
> 
> Indeed, thanks.
> Do I need to resend this one?

Yes please.

Also instead of OR, AND will do the same, but your approach works too, so
either way am fine..

And I do not get correlation with fix on patch 1. This should be independent
change..


-- 
~Vinod