[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160510172313.GA3192@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Tue, 10 May 2016 19:23:13 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Borislav Petkov <bp@...e.de>
Cc: x86-ml <x86@...nel.org>, Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk@...hat.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, Brian Gerst <brgerst@...il.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@...gle.com>,
Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>, zengzhaoxiu@....com,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
Zhaoxiu Zeng <zhaoxiu.zeng@...il.com>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH -v2] x86/hweight: Get rid of the special calling
convention
On Tue, May 10, 2016 at 06:53:18PM +0200, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> static __always_inline unsigned int __arch_hweight32(unsigned int w)
> {
> - unsigned int res = 0;
> + unsigned int res;
>
> - asm (ALTERNATIVE("call __sw_hweight32", POPCNT32, X86_FEATURE_POPCNT)
> - : "="REG_OUT (res)
> - : REG_IN (w));
> + if (likely(static_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_POPCNT))) {
> + /* popcnt %eax, %eax */
> + asm volatile(POPCNT32
> + : "="REG_OUT (res)
> + : REG_IN (w));
>
> - return res;
> + return res;
> + }
> + return __sw_hweight32(w);
> }
So what was wrong with using the normal thunk_*.S wrappers for the
calls? That would allow you to use the alternative() stuff which does
generate smaller code.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists