[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160510191041.GI28520@pd.tnic>
Date: Tue, 10 May 2016 21:10:42 +0200
From: Borislav Petkov <bp@...e.de>
To: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>, x86-ml <x86@...nel.org>,
Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk@...hat.com>,
Brian Gerst <brgerst@...il.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@...gle.com>,
Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>, zengzhaoxiu@....com,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
Zhaoxiu Zeng <zhaoxiu.zeng@...il.com>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH -v2] x86/hweight: Get rid of the special calling
convention
On Tue, May 10, 2016 at 12:03:48PM -0700, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> Also, to be fair... if the problem is with these being in C then we
> could just do it in assembly easily enough.
I thought about converting the __sw_hweight* variants to asm but
__sw_hweight32, for example, is 55 bytes here and that's a lot.
Or do you have a better idea?
peterz's sounds ok to me: we call a thunk which then calls __sw_hweight*
after having saved regs properly - problem solved.
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
SUSE Linux GmbH, GF: Felix Imendörffer, Jane Smithard, Graham Norton, HRB 21284 (AG Nürnberg)
--
Powered by blists - more mailing lists