[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAKv+Gu_vbYk7PgtqPcy3ZTU7VOCd8pNu3ZxFGE=-G2cJyspG0w@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 11 May 2016 07:46:20 +0200
From: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@...aro.org>
To: Mathias Krause <minipli@...glemail.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
"x86@...nel.org" <x86@...nel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@...e.de>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...ux.intel.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86/extable: ensure entries are swapped completely when sorting
On 10 May 2016 at 23:07, Mathias Krause <minipli@...glemail.com> wrote:
> The x86 exception table sorting was changed in commit 29934b0fb8ff
> ("x86/extable: use generic search and sort routines") to use the arch
> independent code in lib/extable.c. However, the patch was mangled
> somehow on its way into the kernel from the last version posted at [1].
> The committed version kind of attempted to incorporate the changes of
> commit 548acf19234d ("x86/mm: Expand the exception table logic to allow
> new handling options") as in _completely_ _ignoring_ the x86 specific
> 'handler' member of struct exception_table_entry. This effectively broke
> the sorting as entries will only partly be swapped now.
>
OK, it appears that Tony's patches grew a 'handler' field fairly late
in their review cycle, and I didn't pick up on that. Apologies.
> Fortunately, the x86 Kconfig selects BUILDTIME_EXTABLE_SORT, so the
> exception table doesn't need to be sorted at runtime. However, in case
> that ever changes, we better not break the exception table sorting just
> because of that.
>
BUILDTIME_EXTABLE_SORT applies to the core image only, but we still
rely on the sorting routines for modules in that case. So I think this
needs to be fixed right away.
> Fix this by providing a swap_ex_entry_fixup() macro that takes care of
> the 'handler' member.
>
> [1] https://lkml.org/lkml/2016/1/27/232
>
> Signed-off-by: Mathias Krause <minipli@...glemail.com>
> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
> Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>
> Cc: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@...aro.org>
> Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@...e.de>
> Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@...ux.intel.com>
> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
> Cc: Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>
Fixes: 29934b0fb8f ("x86/extable: use generic search and sort routines")
Reviewed-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@...aro.org>
Thanks,
Ard.
> ---
> arch/x86/include/asm/uaccess.h | 8 ++++++++
> 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/uaccess.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/uaccess.h
> index a969ae607be8..b69b7bffb0e0 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/uaccess.h
> +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/uaccess.h
> @@ -108,6 +108,14 @@ struct exception_table_entry {
>
> #define ARCH_HAS_RELATIVE_EXTABLE
>
> +#define swap_ex_entry_fixup(a, b, tmp, delta) \
> + do { \
> + (a)->fixup = (b)->fixup + (delta); \
> + (b)->fixup = (tmp).fixup - (delta); \
> + (a)->handler = (b)->handler + (delta); \
> + (b)->handler = (tmp).handler - (delta); \
> + } while (0)
> +
> extern int fixup_exception(struct pt_regs *regs, int trapnr);
> extern bool ex_has_fault_handler(unsigned long ip);
> extern int early_fixup_exception(unsigned long *ip);
> --
> 1.7.10.4
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists