[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160511073855.GQ19473@dell>
Date: Wed, 11 May 2016 08:38:55 +0100
From: Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
To: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@...ionext.com>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@....samsung.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>,
Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@...gutronix.de>,
Jiri Slaby <jslaby@...e.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-clk@...r.kernel.org, Kalle Valo <kvalo@...eaurora.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 01/21] mfd: uniphier: add UniPhier MFD driver
On Wed, 11 May 2016, Masahiro Yamada wrote:
> Hi Lee,
>
> 2016-05-10 20:26 GMT+09:00 Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>:
> >> +};
> >> +MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, uniphier_mfd_match);
> >
> > NACK. Please do not mix MFD and DT registration.
>
> OK, thanks for review.
>
>
> My basic thought was:
>
> - Add an MFD node to my DTS only once.
> If I need to expand it in the future, I will just
> need to modify drivers/mtd/uniphier-mfd.c.
> It is just kernel-internal modification, so it does not
> bother DT binding at all.
>
> - Simplify the node topology of DTS.
Just describe the hardware in DT. If you do so accurately, there
should be no requirement to change it (in theory).
--
Lee Jones
Linaro STMicroelectronics Landing Team Lead
Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog
Powered by blists - more mailing lists