linux-kernel - Re: [RFC v2 PATCH 0/8] VFS:userns: support portable root filesystems

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20160511005340.GN2694@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
Date:	Wed, 11 May 2016 01:53:40 +0100
From:	Al Viro <viro@...IV.linux.org.uk>
To:	James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@...senPartnership.com>
Cc:	Djalal Harouni <tixxdz@...il.com>, Chris Mason <clm@...com>,
	tytso@....edu, Serge Hallyn <serge.hallyn@...onical.com>,
	Josh Triplett <josh@...htriplett.org>,
	"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
	Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
	Seth Forshee <seth.forshee@...onical.com>,
	linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org,
	Dongsu Park <dongsu@...ocode.com>,
	David Herrmann <dh.herrmann@...glemail.com>,
	Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@...hat.com>,
	Alban Crequy <alban.crequy@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC v2 PATCH 0/8] VFS:userns: support portable root filesystems

On Tue, May 10, 2016 at 04:36:56PM -0700, James Bottomley wrote:
> +static int shiftfs_rename2(struct inode *olddir, struct dentry *old,
> +			   struct inode *newdir, struct dentry *new,
> +			   unsigned int flags)
> +{
> +	struct dentry *rodd = olddir->i_private, *rndd = newdir->i_private,
> +		*realold = old->d_inode->i_private,
> +		*realnew = new->d_inode->i_private;
> +	struct inode *realolddir = rodd->d_inode, *realnewdir = rndd->d_inode;
> +	const struct inode_operations *iop = realolddir->i_op;
> +	int err;
> +	const struct cred *oldcred, *newcred;
> +
> +	oldcred = shiftfs_new_creds(&newcred, old->d_sb);
> +	err = iop->rename2(realolddir, realold, realnewdir, realnew, flags);
> +	shiftfs_old_creds(oldcred, &newcred);

... and you've just violated all locking rules for ->rename2().

> +static struct dentry *shiftfs_lookup(struct inode *dir, struct dentry *dentry,
> +				     unsigned int flags)
> +{
> +	struct dentry *real = dir->i_private, *new;
> +	struct inode *reali = real->d_inode, *newi;
> +	const struct cred *oldcred, *newcred;
> +
> +	/* note: violation of usual fs rules here: dentries are never
> +	 * added with d_add.  This is because we want no dentry cache
> +	 * for shiftfs.  All lookups proceed through the dentry cache
> +	 * of the underlying filesystem, meaning we always see any
> +	 * changes in the underlying */

Bloody wonderful.  So
	* we lose caching the negative lookups
	* we've got buggered hardlinks (different inodes for those)
	* it has never, ever been tried on -next (would do rather nasty
things on that d_instantiate())

> +
> +	kfree(sfc);
> +
> +	return err;
> +}

> +	file->f_op = &sfc->fop;

Lovely - now try that with underlying fs something built modular.

Or try to use it on top of something with non-trivial dentry_operations
(hell, on top of itself, for starters).