linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] x86: use compat version for preadv2 and pwritev2

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20160511102518.GA31189@altlinux.org>
Date:	Wed, 11 May 2016 13:25:18 +0300
From:	"Dmitry V. Levin" <ldv@...linux.org>
To:	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Cc:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
	x86@...nel.org, Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Milosz Tanski <milosz@...in.com>,
	Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86: use compat version for preadv2 and pwritev2

On Wed, May 11, 2016 at 12:14:11PM +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Wed, 11 May 2016, Dmitry V. Levin wrote:
> > Similar to preadv and pwritev, preadv2 and pwritev2 need compat entries
> > in the 32-bit syscall table.
> 
> So this is 2016 and we added a syscalls which require compat support. What's
> wrong here?

I'm not sure I understand your question, it looks to me as "why do we add
syscalls that require compat support".  If that's what you are asking,
I have no idea, I'm a strace man.


-- 
ldv