[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160511112409.GE3190@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Wed, 11 May 2016 13:24:09 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Brian Gerst <brgerst@...il.com>
Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@...e.de>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
x86-ml <x86@...nel.org>, Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk@...hat.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@...gle.com>,
Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>, zengzhaoxiu@....com,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
Zhaoxiu Zeng <zhaoxiu.zeng@...il.com>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH -v2] x86/hweight: Get rid of the special calling
convention
On Wed, May 11, 2016 at 07:15:19AM -0400, Brian Gerst wrote:
> I think he meant the out of line version would be asm, so you could
> control what registers were clobbered.
Yeah, it might save a few cycles on the call, but given that most
machines should have popcnt these days is it worth the hassle/cost of
duplicating the lib/hweight.c magic in asm (and remember, twice, once
for 32bit and once for 64bit) ?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists