linux-kernel - [PATCH 1/2] sched: use tsk_cpus_allowed() instead of accessing ->cpus

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 11 May 2016 14:23:30 +0200
From:	Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>
To:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] sched: use tsk_cpus_allowed() instead of accessing ->cpus_allowed

From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>

Use the future-safe accessor for struct task_struct's.

Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>
---
 kernel/sched/cpudeadline.c | 4 ++--
 kernel/sched/cpupri.c      | 4 ++--
 kernel/sched/deadline.c    | 2 +-
 3 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/sched/cpudeadline.c b/kernel/sched/cpudeadline.c
index 5a75b08cfd85..5be58820465c 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/cpudeadline.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/cpudeadline.c
@@ -103,10 +103,10 @@ int cpudl_find(struct cpudl *cp, struct task_struct *p,
 	const struct sched_dl_entity *dl_se = &p->dl;
 
 	if (later_mask &&
-	    cpumask_and(later_mask, cp->free_cpus, &p->cpus_allowed)) {
+	    cpumask_and(later_mask, cp->free_cpus, tsk_cpus_allowed(p))) {
 		best_cpu = cpumask_any(later_mask);
 		goto out;
-	} else if (cpumask_test_cpu(cpudl_maximum(cp), &p->cpus_allowed) &&
+	} else if (cpumask_test_cpu(cpudl_maximum(cp), tsk_cpus_allowed(p)) &&
 			dl_time_before(dl_se->deadline, cp->elements[0].dl)) {
 		best_cpu = cpudl_maximum(cp);
 		if (later_mask)
diff --git a/kernel/sched/cpupri.c b/kernel/sched/cpupri.c
index 981fcd7dc394..11e9705bf937 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/cpupri.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/cpupri.c
@@ -103,11 +103,11 @@ int cpupri_find(struct cpupri *cp, struct task_struct *p,
 		if (skip)
 			continue;
 
-		if (cpumask_any_and(&p->cpus_allowed, vec->mask) >= nr_cpu_ids)
+		if (cpumask_any_and(tsk_cpus_allowed(p), vec->mask) >= nr_cpu_ids)
 			continue;
 
 		if (lowest_mask) {
-			cpumask_and(lowest_mask, &p->cpus_allowed, vec->mask);
+			cpumask_and(lowest_mask, tsk_cpus_allowed(p), vec->mask);
 
 			/*
 			 * We have to ensure that we have at least one bit
diff --git a/kernel/sched/deadline.c b/kernel/sched/deadline.c
index affd97ec9f65..eb95f87c474c 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/deadline.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/deadline.c
@@ -1392,7 +1392,7 @@ static struct rq *find_lock_later_rq(struct task_struct *task, struct rq *rq)
 		if (double_lock_balance(rq, later_rq)) {
 			if (unlikely(task_rq(task) != rq ||
 				     !cpumask_test_cpu(later_rq->cpu,
-				                       &task->cpus_allowed) ||
+						       tsk_cpus_allowed(task)) ||
 				     task_running(rq, task) ||
 				     !task_on_rq_queued(task))) {
 				double_unlock_balance(rq, later_rq);
-- 
2.8.1