[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5733291E.80001@linux.intel.com>
Date: Wed, 11 May 2016 05:44:14 -0700
From: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...ux.intel.com>
To: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@...ux.intel.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Cc: linux-arch@...r.kernel.org, Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>,
Rafael Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>,
"Srivatsa S. Bhat" <srivatsa@....edu>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Sebastian Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>,
Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>, Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Paul McKenney <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Paul Turner <pjt@...gle.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
rui.zhang@...el.com, len.brown@...el.com
Subject: Re: S3 resume regression [1cf4f629d9d2 ("cpu/hotplug: Move online
calls to hotplugged cpu")]
On 5/11/2016 3:19 AM, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
> Oh, and this was with acpi_idle. This machine already failed to
> resume from S3 with intel_idle since forever, as detailed in
> https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=107151
> but acpi_idle worked fine until now.
this is the important clue part afaics.
some of these very old Atom's had issues (bios?) with S3 if the cores were in a too-deep C state,
and at some point there was a workaround (I forgot where in the code) to ban those deep
C states around S3 on those cpus. I wonder if moving things around has made said workaround
ineffective.....
Powered by blists - more mailing lists