lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Wed, 11 May 2016 23:13:58 +0530
From:	Abhishek Sahu <absahu@...eaurora.org>
To:	Sricharan <sricharan@...eaurora.org>
Cc:	agross@...eaurora.org, architt@...eaurora.org,
	linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, ntelkar@...eaurora.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, andy.gross@...aro.org,
	linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org, dmaengine@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, wsa@...-dreams.de
Subject: RE: [PATCH 2/2] i2c: qup: Fixed the DMA segments length

On 2016-05-11 21:48, Sricharan wrote:
> Hi,
> 
>> 1. The current QCOM I2C driver code is failing for transfer length 
>> greater
>> than 255. This is happening due to improper segments length as the I2C 
>> DMA
>> segments can be maximum of 256 bytes.
>> 
>> 2. The transfer length tlen was being initialized with 0 for 256 
>> bytes,
>> which is
>> being passed for DMA mappings resulting in improper DMA mapping 
>> length.
>> 
>> This patch fixes the above said problems by initializing the block 
>> count
>> with
>> the values calculated in qup_i2c_set_blk_data and calculating the
> remaining
>> length for last DMA segment. Also, the block data length need to be
>> decremented after each transfer. Additionally, this patch corrects the
>> tlen
>> assignment for DMA mapping.
>> 
>> Signed-off-by: Abhishek Sahu <absahu@...eaurora.org>
>> ---
>>  drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-qup.c | 12 +++++++-----
>>  1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>> 
>> diff --git a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-qup.c 
>> b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-qup.c
>> index
>> 8c2f1bc..6d6b7dc 100644
>> --- a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-qup.c
>> +++ b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-qup.c
>> @@ -651,23 +651,24 @@ static int qup_i2c_bam_do_xfer(struct
>> qup_i2c_dev *qup, struct i2c_msg *msg,
>>  	u8 *tags;
>> 
>>  	while (idx < num) {
>> -		blocks = (msg->len + limit) / limit;
>> -		rem = msg->len % limit;
>>  		tx_len = 0, len = 0, i = 0;
>> 
>>  		qup->is_last = (idx == (num - 1));
>> 
>>  		qup_i2c_set_blk_data(qup, msg);
>> 
>> +		blocks = qup->blk.count;
>> +		rem = msg->len - (blocks - 1) * limit;
>> +
>       Same if we had blocks = (msg->len + limit - 1) / limit instead of 
> the
> above ?
Yes. We calculating this inside qup_i2c_set_blk_data and assigning the 
same value to
qup->blk.count so I am using this to avoid redundant arithmetic 
operations.
>      Otherwise,
>      Reviewed-by: Sricharan@...eaurora.org
> 
> Regards,
>  Sricharan

-- 
Abhishek Sahu

Powered by blists - more mailing lists