lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1462991986.29294.29.camel@intel.com>
Date:	Wed, 11 May 2016 18:39:59 +0000
From:	"Verma, Vishal L" <vishal.l.verma@...el.com>
To:	"linux-nvdimm@...ts.01.org" <linux-nvdimm@...ts.01.org>
CC:	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-block@...r.kernel.org" <linux-block@...r.kernel.org>,
	"hch@...radead.org" <hch@...radead.org>,
	"xfs@....sgi.com" <xfs@....sgi.com>,
	"jmoyer@...hat.com" <jmoyer@...hat.com>,
	"linux-mm@...ck.org" <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
	"Williams, Dan J" <dan.j.williams@...el.com>,
	"axboe@...com" <axboe@...com>,
	"akpm@...ux-foundation.org" <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	"linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"ross.zwisler@...ux.intel.com" <ross.zwisler@...ux.intel.com>,
	"linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org" <linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org>,
	"boaz@...xistor.com" <boaz@...xistor.com>,
	"david@...morbit.com" <david@...morbit.com>,
	"jack@...e.cz" <jack@...e.cz>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 4/5] dax: for truncate/hole-punch, do zeroing through
 the driver if possible

On Tue, 2016-05-10 at 12:49 -0600, Vishal Verma wrote:
> 
...

> @@ -1240,11 +1254,16 @@ int dax_zero_page_range(struct inode *inode,
> loff_t from, unsigned length,
>  			.size = PAGE_SIZE,
>  		};
>  
> -		if (dax_map_atomic(bdev, &dax) < 0)
> -			return PTR_ERR(dax.addr);
> -		clear_pmem(dax.addr + offset, length);
> -		wmb_pmem();
> -		dax_unmap_atomic(bdev, &dax);
> +		if (dax_range_is_aligned(bdev, &dax, offset, length))
> +			return blkdev_issue_zeroout(bdev, dax.sector,
> +					length >> 9, GFP_NOFS, true);

Found another bug here while testing. The zeroout needs to be done for
sector + (offset >> 9). The above just zeroed out the first sector of
the page irrespective of offset, which is wrong.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ