[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <3708662.2e5qAbF2Fs@vostro.rjw.lan>
Date: Thu, 12 May 2016 00:46:45 +0200
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>
To: Linux PM list <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH] intel_pstate: Simplify conditional in intel_pstate_set_policy()
From: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>
One of the if () statements in intel_pstate_set_policy() causes
another if () to be evaluated if the condition is true and it
doesn't do anything else, so merge the two if () statements into
one.
No functional changes.
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>
---
drivers/cpufreq/intel_pstate.c | 11 +++++------
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
Index: linux-pm/drivers/cpufreq/intel_pstate.c
===================================================================
--- linux-pm.orig/drivers/cpufreq/intel_pstate.c
+++ linux-pm/drivers/cpufreq/intel_pstate.c
@@ -1449,12 +1449,11 @@ static int intel_pstate_set_policy(struc
intel_pstate_clear_update_util_hook(policy->cpu);
cpu = all_cpu_data[0];
- if (cpu->pstate.max_pstate_physical > cpu->pstate.max_pstate) {
- if (policy->max < policy->cpuinfo.max_freq &&
- policy->max > cpu->pstate.max_pstate * cpu->pstate.scaling) {
- pr_debug("policy->max > max non turbo frequency\n");
- policy->max = policy->cpuinfo.max_freq;
- }
+ if (cpu->pstate.max_pstate_physical > cpu->pstate.max_pstate &&
+ policy->max < policy->cpuinfo.max_freq &&
+ policy->max > cpu->pstate.max_pstate * cpu->pstate.scaling) {
+ pr_debug("policy->max > max non turbo frequency\n");
+ policy->max = policy->cpuinfo.max_freq;
}
if (policy->policy == CPUFREQ_POLICY_PERFORMANCE) {
Powered by blists - more mailing lists