[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5733D8DC.1010603@rock-chips.com>
Date: Thu, 12 May 2016 09:14:04 +0800
From: "David.Wu" <david.wu@...k-chips.com>
To: Doug Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>
Cc: Heiko Stübner <heiko@...ech.de>,
Wolfram Sang <wsa@...-dreams.de>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>,
Pawel Moll <pawel.moll@....com>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Ian Campbell <ijc+devicetree@...lion.org.uk>,
Kumar Gala <galak@...eaurora.org>,
Brian Norris <briannorris@...gle.com>,
David Riley <davidriley@...gle.com>,
Tao Huang <huangtao@...k-chips.com>,
Lin Huang <hl@...k-chips.com>, Jianqun Xu <xjq@...k-chips.com>,
Chris <zyw@...k-chips.com>, Eddie Cai <cf@...k-chips.com>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"open list:ARM/Rockchip SoC..." <linux-rockchip@...ts.infradead.org>,
"linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org" <linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org>,
"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 6/8] dt-bindings: i2c: rk3x: add support for rk3399
Hi Doug,
在 2016/5/12 0:35, Doug Anderson 写道:
> Hi,
>
> On Tue, May 10, 2016 at 12:30 PM, David Wu <david.wu@...k-chips.com> wrote:
>> The bus clock and function clock are separated at rk3399,
>> and others use one clock as the bus clock and function clock.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: David Wu <david.wu@...k-chips.com>
>> Reviewed-by: Douglas Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>
>> ---
>> Change in v8:
>> - remove error description.
>>
>> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/i2c/i2c-rk3x.txt | 16 +++++++++++++---
>> 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/i2c/i2c-rk3x.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/i2c/i2c-rk3x.txt
>> index 0b4a85f..5429301 100644
>> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/i2c/i2c-rk3x.txt
>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/i2c/i2c-rk3x.txt
>> @@ -6,10 +6,20 @@ RK3xxx SoCs.
>> Required properties :
>>
>> - reg : Offset and length of the register set for the device
>> - - compatible : should be "rockchip,rk3066-i2c", "rockchip,rk3188-i2c",
>> - "rockchip,rk3228-i2c" or "rockchip,rk3288-i2c".
>> + - compatible: should be one of the following:
>> + - "rockchip,rk3066-i2c": for rk3066
>> + - "rockchip,rk3188-i2c": for rk3188
>> + - "rockchip,rk3228-i2c": for rk3228
>> + - "rockchip,rk3288-i2c": for rk3288
>> + - "rockchip,rk3399-i2c": for rk3399
>> - interrupts : interrupt number
>> - - clocks : parent clock
>> + - clocks: See ../clock/clock-bindings.txt
>> + - For older hardware (rk3066, rk3188, rk3228, rk3288):
>> + - There is one clock that's used both to derive the functional clock
>> + for the device and as the bus clock.
>> + - For newer hardware (rk3399): specified by name
>> + - "i2c": REQUIRED. This is used to derive the functional clock.
>> + - "pclk": REQUIRED. This is the bus clock.
>
> Depending on what Rob thinks, it might make sense to remove the above
> two "REQUIRED" bits. That would match his earlier feedback since
> we're still in the "Required" section and thus it is redundant.
>
Okay, i make a little misunderstand for that, so i will fix it in next
version.
> -Doug
>
>
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists