[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAJZ5v0jOAOWLNab0vMOVyciwOhtkuPdqZt3wkFbprq+PkEQNVg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 12 May 2016 13:27:23 +0200
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>
To: Jayachandran C <jchandra@...adcom.com>
Cc: Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@...nel.org>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@....com>,
Tomasz Nowicki <tn@...ihalf.com>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
Hanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@...aro.org>,
Sinan Kaya <okaya@...eaurora.org>,
robert.richter@...iumnetworks.com, Marcin Wojtas <mw@...ihalf.com>,
Liviu.Dudau@....com, David Daney <ddaney@...iumnetworks.com>,
Wangyijing <wangyijing@...wei.com>,
Suravee Suthikulanit <Suravee.Suthikulpanit@....com>,
Mark Salter <msalter@...hat.com>,
Linux PCI <linux-pci@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
ACPI Devel Maling List <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linaro-acpi@...ts.linaro.org" <linaro-acpi@...ts.linaro.org>,
Jon Masters <jcm@...hat.com>,
Andrea Gallo <andrea.gallo@...aro.org>,
Duc Dang <dhdang@....com>, jeremy.linton@....com,
liudongdong3@...wei.com, Christopher Covington <cov@...eaurora.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V7 07/11] pci, acpi: Handle ACPI companion assignment.
On Thu, May 12, 2016 at 12:43 PM, Jayachandran C <jchandra@...adcom.com> wrote:
> On Thu, May 12, 2016 at 4:13 AM, Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@...nel.org> wrote:
>> On Wed, May 11, 2016 at 10:30:51PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>>> On Wed, May 11, 2016 at 12:11 PM, Lorenzo Pieralisi
>>> <lorenzo.pieralisi@....com> wrote:
>>> > On Tue, May 10, 2016 at 08:37:00PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>>> >> On Tue, May 10, 2016 at 5:19 PM, Tomasz Nowicki <tn@...ihalf.com> wrote:
[cut]
>
> If we are moving the ACPI/PCI code from drivers/acpi to
> arch/arm64/ , there is an issue in having the header file
> ecam.h in drivers/pci
>
> The current include of "../pci/ecam.h" is slightly ugly (Arnd
> and David had already noted this), but including the driver
> header from arch code would be even worse.
>
> I can either merge ecam.h into include/linux/pci.h
> or move it to a new file include/linux/pci-ecam.h, any
> suggestion on which is preferable?
My preference would be pci-ecam.h as we did a similar thing for
pci-dma.h, for example, but basically this is up to Bjorn.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists