[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <57347BD4.8010105@huawei.com>
Date: Thu, 12 May 2016 20:49:24 +0800
From: "Zhangjian (Bamvor)" <bamvor.zhangjian@...wei.com>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>
CC: <linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>,
Andrew Pinski <Andrew.Pinski@...iumnetworks.com>,
<heiko.carstens@...ibm.com>,
Yury Norov <ynorov@...iumnetworks.com>,
Hanjun Guo <guohanjun@...wei.com>, <joseph@...esourcery.com>,
<linux-arch@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-s390@...r.kernel.org>,
"jijun (D)" <jijun2@...wei.com>,
<Prasun.Kapoor@...iumnetworks.com>, <schwab@...e.de>,
<agraf@...e.de>, <pinskia@...il.com>, <klimov.linux@...il.com>,
<broonie@...nel.org>, <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
<Nathan_Lynch@...tor.com>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Andrew Pinski <apinski@...ium.com>, <schwidefsky@...ibm.com>,
<christoph.muellner@...obroma-systems.com>,
"Zhangjian (Bamvor)" <bamvor.zhangjian@...wei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 20/25] arm64:ilp32: add sys_ilp32.c and a separate table
(in entry.S) to use it
Hi,
On 2016/5/12 17:21, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Thursday 12 May 2016 10:17:58 Catalin Marinas wrote:
>> On Wed, May 11, 2016 at 09:30:07PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
>>> On Wednesday 11 May 2016 17:59:01 Catalin Marinas wrote:
>>>
>>> I don't think the shifts are a problem, the main downside would be
>>> the limit to 44 bits of file offsets (16TB files), but it's also
>>> unclear if that is a practical problem at all. If it is, we run
>>> into the same problem on all other 32-bit architectures too.
>>
>> I hope people are seriously thinking of moving to an LP64 ABI if they
>> have such large file offset needs.
>
> Good point. 44 bits of file size is certainly enough for mmap()
> on a 32-bit task: you would only be able to map a very small fraction
> of the file anyway, and if you want to map larger files, and should
> move to 64-bit tasks long before this becomes a limitation.
Hi,
I apply the following patch in order to make use of the REAL mmmap2. LTP
test pass in litle endian. mmap16 successful with segfault in big endian.
BTW, I saw the similar code in tile, mips, microblaze and s390 compat. Should
we merge these code into a common syscall wrapper?
kernel:
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/sys_ilp32.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/sys_ilp32.c
index d85fe94..2cd72eb 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kernel/sys_ilp32.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/sys_ilp32.c
@@ -41,7 +41,16 @@
#define compat_sys_sync_file_range sys_sync_file_range
#define compat_sys_truncate64 sys_truncate
#define sys_llseek sys_lseek
-#define sys_mmap2 sys_mmap
+
+SYSCALL_DEFINE6(mmap2, unsigned long, addr, unsigned long, len,
+ unsigned long, prot, unsigned long, flags, unsigned long, fd,
+ unsigned long, pgoff)
+{
+ if (pgoff & (~PAGE_MASK >> 12))
+ return -EINVAL;
+
+ return sys_mmap_pgoff(addr, len, prot, flags, fd, pgoff >> (PAGE_SHIFT-12));
+}
asmlinkage long ilp32_sys_rt_sigreturn_wrapper(void);
#define compat_sys_rt_sigreturn ilp32_sys_rt_sigreturn_wrapper
glibc:
diff --git a/sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/aarch64/ilp32/mmap.c b/sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/aarch64/ilp32/mmap.c
index e69de29..f75e251 100644
--- a/sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/aarch64/ilp32/mmap.c
+++ b/sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/aarch64/ilp32/mmap.c
@@ -0,0 +1,2 @@
+#include <sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/generic/wordsize-32/mmap.c>
+
diff --git a/sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/aarch64/ilp32/mmap64.c b/sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/aarch64/ilp32/mmap64.c
index c6c7f1d..6f1a141 100644
--- a/sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/aarch64/ilp32/mmap64.c
+++ b/sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/aarch64/ilp32/mmap64.c
@@ -1,29 +1 @@
-#include <errno.h>
-#include <unistd.h>
-#include <sys/mman.h>
-#include <string.h>
-
-#include <sysdep.h>
-#include <sys/syscall.h>
-
-/* mmap is provided by mmap as they are the same. */
-void *__mmap (void *__addr, size_t __len, int __prot,
- int __flags, int __fd, __off_t __offset)
-{
- void *result;
- result = (void *) INLINE_SYSCALL (mmap2, 6, __addr, __len, __prot, __flags,
- return result;
-}
-/* mmap64 is provided by mmap as they are the same. */
-void *__mmap64 (void *__addr, size_t __len, int __prot,
- int __flags, int __fd, __off64_t __offset)
-{
- void *result;
- result = (void *)
- INLINE_SYSCALL (mmap2, 6, __addr,
- __len, __prot, __flags, __fd, __offset);
- return result;
-}
-weak_alias (__mmap, mmap)
-weak_alias (__mmap64, mmap64)
+#include <sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/mmap64.c>
Regards
Bamvor
> Arnd
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists