linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 20/25] arm64:ilp32: add sys_ilp32.c and a separate table (in entry.S) to use it

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20160512131948.GA30205@yury-N73SV>
Date:	Thu, 12 May 2016 16:19:48 +0300
From:	Yury Norov <ynorov@...iumnetworks.com>
To:	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
CC:	"Zhangjian (Bamvor)" <bamvor.zhangjian@...wei.com>,
	Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
	<linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>,
	Andrew Pinski <Andrew.Pinski@...iumnetworks.com>,
	<heiko.carstens@...ibm.com>, Hanjun Guo <guohanjun@...wei.com>,
	<joseph@...esourcery.com>, <linux-arch@...r.kernel.org>,
	<linux-s390@...r.kernel.org>, "jijun (D)" <jijun2@...wei.com>,
	<Prasun.Kapoor@...iumnetworks.com>, <schwab@...e.de>,
	<agraf@...e.de>, <pinskia@...il.com>, <klimov.linux@...il.com>,
	<broonie@...nel.org>, <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
	<Nathan_Lynch@...tor.com>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Andrew Pinski <apinski@...ium.com>, <schwidefsky@...ibm.com>,
	<christoph.muellner@...obroma-systems.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 20/25] arm64:ilp32: add sys_ilp32.c and a separate table
 (in entry.S) to use it

On Thu, May 12, 2016 at 03:06:39PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Thursday 12 May 2016 20:49:24 Zhangjian wrote:
> > Hi,
> > 
> > On 2016/5/12 17:21, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > > On Thursday 12 May 2016 10:17:58 Catalin Marinas wrote:
> > >> On Wed, May 11, 2016 at 09:30:07PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > >>> On Wednesday 11 May 2016 17:59:01 Catalin Marinas wrote:
> > >>>
> > >>> I don't think the shifts are a problem, the main downside would be
> > >>> the limit to 44 bits of file offsets (16TB files), but it's also
> > >>> unclear if that is a practical problem at all. If it is, we run
> > >>> into the same problem on all other 32-bit architectures too.
> > >>
> > >> I hope people are seriously thinking of moving to an LP64 ABI if they
> > >> have such large file offset needs.
> > >
> > > Good point. 44 bits of file size is certainly enough for mmap()
> > > on a 32-bit task: you would only be able to map a very small fraction
> > > of the file anyway, and if you want to map larger files, and should
> > > move to 64-bit tasks long before this becomes a limitation.
> > Hi,
> > 
> > I apply the following patch in order to make use of the REAL mmmap2. LTP
> > test pass in litle endian. mmap16 successful with segfault in big endian.
> > 
> > BTW, I saw the similar code in tile, mips, microblaze and s390 compat. Should
> > we merge these code into a common syscall wrapper?
> 
> I think that's a good idea. The function used to be slightly different
> for each architecture, but now it seems we have a significant number
> of identical implementations that we could just merge them together
> into one.
> 
> sys_mmap_pgoff was originally introduced as the common implementation
> and it reduced the amount of duplication a lot, but as its units
> are based on PAGE_SIZE rather than hardwired 4096 bytes, it's
> not as useful.
> 

microblaze and mips (twice) are doing like this. And aarh32 as well,
in arch/arm64/kernel/entry32.S

In previous submissions it was a patch that shares aarch32 code to
ilp32. If we decided turn around again, I think, we'd pick up that patch.

The other option is to make this hack generic, as so many arches use it.