[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CA+aCy1F7iHS+MwG8o28zQNw=11KnwPhDcaAQZ1ZknEt2tHPAng@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 12 May 2016 20:38:13 +0530
From: Pranay Srivastava <pranjas@...il.com>
To: Markus Pargmann <mpa@...gutronix.de>
Cc: nbd-general@...ts.sourceforge.net, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] nbd: Move socket shutdown out of spinlock
On Thu, May 12, 2016 at 6:13 PM, Markus Pargmann <mpa@...gutronix.de> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Thursday 12 May 2016 16:42:31 Pranay Srivastava wrote:
>> Hi Markus,
>>
>>
>> On Thu, May 12, 2016 at 3:13 PM, Markus Pargmann <mpa@...gutronix.de> wrote:
>> > spinlocked ranges should be small and not contain calls into huge
>> > subfunctions. Fix my mistake and just get the pointer to the socket
>> > instead of doing everything with spinlock held.
>> >
>> > Reported-by: Mikulas Patocka <mikulas@...bright.com>
>> > Signed-off-by: Markus Pargmann <mpa@...gutronix.de>
>> > ---
>> > drivers/block/nbd.c | 18 ++++++++++--------
>> > 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>> >
>> > diff --git a/drivers/block/nbd.c b/drivers/block/nbd.c
>> > index 0b892eed06a0..157bf3da876e 100644
>> > --- a/drivers/block/nbd.c
>> > +++ b/drivers/block/nbd.c
>> > @@ -173,20 +173,22 @@ static void nbd_end_request(struct nbd_device *nbd, struct request *req)
>> > */
>> > static void sock_shutdown(struct nbd_device *nbd)
>> > {
>> > + struct socket *sock;
>> > +
>> > spin_lock_irq(&nbd->sock_lock);
>> > + sock = nbd->sock;
>> > + nbd->sock = NULL;
>> > + spin_unlock_irq(&nbd->sock_lock);
>> >
>> > - if (!nbd->sock) {
>> > - spin_unlock_irq(&nbd->sock_lock);
>> > + if (!sock)
>> > return;
>> > - }
>> > +
>> > + del_timer(&nbd->timeout_timer);
>> >
>> > dev_warn(disk_to_dev(nbd->disk), "shutting down socket\n");
>> > - kernel_sock_shutdown(nbd->sock, SHUT_RDWR);
>> > - sockfd_put(nbd->sock);
>> > - nbd->sock = NULL;
>> > - spin_unlock_irq(&nbd->sock_lock);
>> > + kernel_sock_shutdown(sock, SHUT_RDWR);
>> > + sockfd_put(sock);
>> >
>> > - del_timer(&nbd->timeout_timer);
>> > }
>> >
>> > static void nbd_xmit_timeout(unsigned long arg)
>>
>> I was concerned about nbd_xmit_timeout as well. There's also a call to
>> kernel_sock_shutdown,
>> while holding the spin_lock in the timeout. The above is ok for
>> sock_shutdown but some kind of change
>> is also required in nbd_xmit_timeout as well. My patch addressed both these.
>
> Oh I see thanks. Seems there is some duplicate code in
> nbd_xmit_timeout and sock_shutdown. I think nbd_xmit_timeout could
> perhaps be simplified?
>
> static void nbd_xmit_timeout(unsigned long arg)
> {
> struct nbd_device *nbd = (struct nbd_device *)arg;
>
> if (list_empty(&nbd->queue_head))
> return;
>
> nbd->timedout = true;
> dev_err(nbd_to_dev(nbd), "Connection timed out, shutting down connection\n");
>
> sock_shutdown(nbd);
Even then, the timeout is non-process context so there will still be a
might_sleep warning.
So sock_shutdown itself can be simplified, as you posted in earlier patch,
but I don't think sock_shutdown should be called from non-process context[?].
> }
>
> Thanks,
>
> Markus
>
> --
> Pengutronix e.K. | |
> Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |
> Peiner Str. 6-8, 31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0 |
> Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 |
--
---P.K.S
Powered by blists - more mailing lists