linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 1/1] dmaengine: slave means at least one of DMA_SLAVE, DMA

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20160512054528.GX2274@localhost>
Date:	Thu, 12 May 2016 11:15:28 +0530
From:	Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@...el.com>
To:	Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, dmaengine@...r.kernel.org,
	Peter Hurley <peter@...leysoftware.com>,
	linux-serial@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/1] dmaengine: slave means at least one of DMA_SLAVE,
 DMA_CYCLIC

On Tue, May 10, 2016 at 08:43:34PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> When check for capabilities recognize slave support by either DMA_SLAVE or
> DMA_CYCLIC bit set. If we don't do that the user can't get a normally worked
> DMA support for engines that doesn't have one of the mentioned bits set.

Applied, thanks

-- 
~Vinod