[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1463075104-26924-1-git-send-email-rklein@nvidia.com>
Date: Thu, 12 May 2016 13:45:04 -0400
From: Rhyland Klein <rklein@...dia.com>
To: Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
CC: Laxman Dewangan <ldewangan@...dia.com>,
<linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Rhyland Klein <rklein@...dia.com>
Subject: [PATCH] mfd: max77620: Fix FPS switch statements
When configuring FPS during probe, assuming a DT node is present for
FPS, the code can run into a problem with the switch statements in
max77620_config_fps() and max77620_get_fps_period_reg_value(). Namely,
in the case of chip->chip_id == MAX77620, it will set
fps_[mix|max]_period but then fall through to the default switch case
and return -EINVAL. Returning this from max77620_config_fps() will
cause probe to fail.
Signed-off-by: Rhyland Klein <rklein@...dia.com>
---
drivers/mfd/max77620.c | 2 ++
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/mfd/max77620.c b/drivers/mfd/max77620.c
index 199d261990be..f32fbb8e8129 100644
--- a/drivers/mfd/max77620.c
+++ b/drivers/mfd/max77620.c
@@ -203,6 +203,7 @@ static int max77620_get_fps_period_reg_value(struct max77620_chip *chip,
break;
case MAX77620:
fps_min_period = MAX77620_FPS_PERIOD_MIN_US;
+ break;
default:
return -EINVAL;
}
@@ -236,6 +237,7 @@ static int max77620_config_fps(struct max77620_chip *chip,
break;
case MAX77620:
fps_max_period = MAX77620_FPS_PERIOD_MAX_US;
+ break;
default:
return -EINVAL;
}
--
1.9.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists