linux-kernel - [PATCH v5 2/4] x86, boot: PUD VA support for physical mapping (x86

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1463081300-11127-3-git-send-email-thgarnie@google.com>
Date:	Thu, 12 May 2016 12:28:18 -0700
From:	Thomas Garnier <thgarnie@...gle.com>
To:	"H . Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...e.de>,
	Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
	Thomas Garnier <thgarnie@...gle.com>,
	Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@...gle.com>,
	Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
	Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>,
	Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
	Stephen Smalley <sds@...ho.nsa.gov>,
	Kefeng Wang <wangkefeng.wang@...wei.com>,
	Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
	Matt Fleming <matt@...eblueprint.co.uk>,
	Toshi Kani <toshi.kani@....com>,
	Alexander Kuleshov <kuleshovmail@...il.com>,
	Alexander Popov <alpopov@...ecurity.com>,
	Joerg Roedel <jroedel@...e.de>, Dave Young <dyoung@...hat.com>,
	Baoquan He <bhe@...hat.com>,
	Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
	Mark Salter <msalter@...hat.com>,
	Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@...cle.com>
Cc:	x86@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, gthelen@...gle.com,
	kernel-hardening@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: [PATCH v5 2/4] x86, boot: PUD VA support for physical mapping (x86_64)

Minor change that allows early boot physical mapping of PUD level virtual
addresses. The current implementation expect the virtual address to be
PUD aligned. For KASLR memory randomization, we need to be able to
randomize the offset used on the PUD table.

It has no impact on current usage.

Signed-off-by: Thomas Garnier <thgarnie@...gle.com>
---
Based on next-20160511
---
 arch/x86/mm/init_64.c | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/mm/init_64.c b/arch/x86/mm/init_64.c
index bce2e5d..f205f39 100644
--- a/arch/x86/mm/init_64.c
+++ b/arch/x86/mm/init_64.c
@@ -454,10 +454,10 @@ phys_pud_init(pud_t *pud_page, unsigned long addr, unsigned long end,
 {
 	unsigned long pages = 0, next;
 	unsigned long last_map_addr = end;
-	int i = pud_index(addr);
+	int i = pud_index((unsigned long)__va(addr));
 
 	for (; i < PTRS_PER_PUD; i++, addr = next) {
-		pud_t *pud = pud_page + pud_index(addr);
+		pud_t *pud = pud_page + pud_index((unsigned long)__va(addr));
 		pmd_t *pmd;
 		pgprot_t prot = PAGE_KERNEL;
 
-- 
2.8.0.rc3.226.g39d4020