[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <57353191.7020609@huawei.com>
Date: Fri, 13 May 2016 09:44:49 +0800
From: Kefeng Wang <wangkefeng.wang@...wei.com>
To: Rich Felker <dalias@...c.org>
CC: <robh+dt@...nel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>, <arnd@...db.de>,
<shawnguo@...nel.org>, <catalin.marinas@....com>,
<grant.likely@...aro.org>, <olof@...om.net>,
<linux@....linux.org.uk>, <yamada.masahiro@...ionext.com>,
<guohanjun@...wei.com>, Yoshinori Sato <ysato@...rs.sourceforge.jp>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 10/18] sh: Remove unnecessary of_platform_populate with
default match table
On 2016/5/13 2:38, Rich Felker wrote:
> On Thu, May 12, 2016 at 08:06:07PM +0800, Kefeng Wang wrote:
>> After patch "of/platform: Add common method to populate default bus",
>> it is possible for arch code to remove unnecessary callers about the
>> of_platform_populate with default match table.
>
> s/about the/of/ ?
Ok, will update.
>
>> Cc: Yoshinori Sato <ysato@...rs.sourceforge.jp>
>> Cc: Rich Felker <dalias@...c.org>
>> Signed-off-by: Kefeng Wang <wangkefeng.wang@...wei.com>
>> ---
>> arch/sh/boards/of-generic.c | 14 --------------
>> 1 file changed, 14 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/sh/boards/of-generic.c b/arch/sh/boards/of-generic.c
>> index b4d4313..911ffb9 100644
>> --- a/arch/sh/boards/of-generic.c
>> +++ b/arch/sh/boards/of-generic.c
>> @@ -9,7 +9,6 @@
>> */
>>
>> #include <linux/of.h>
>> -#include <linux/of_platform.h>
>> #include <linux/of_fdt.h>
>> #include <linux/clocksource.h>
>> #include <linux/irqchip.h>
>> @@ -179,16 +178,3 @@ void __init arch_init_clk_ops(struct sh_clk_ops **ops, int idx)
>> void __init plat_irq_setup(void)
>> {
>> }
>> -
>> -static int __init sh_of_device_init(void)
>> -{
>> - pr_info("SH generic board support: populating platform devices\n");
>> - if (of_have_populated_dt()) {
>> - of_platform_populate(NULL, of_default_bus_match_table,
>> - NULL, NULL);
>> - } else {
>> - pr_crit("Device tree not populated\n");
>> - }
>> - return 0;
>> -}
>> -arch_initcall_sync(sh_of_device_init);
>> --
>> 1.7.12.4
>
> I have not tested this, but as long as the new arch-generic code takes
> place at the same point in the init sequence (arch_initcall_sync), as
> it seems to, I don't expect any sh-specific breakage. In general I'm
> happy to see this kind of change.
Hope no breakage in all archs, but I can only test this in few arm/arm64 boards :(
Thanks,
Kefeng
>
> Rich
>
> .
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists