linux-kernel - Re: Two mailing lists

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 13 May 2016 11:00:37 +0200
From:	Richard Weinberger <richard.weinberger@...il.com>
To:	Joonas Saarinen <jza@...nalahti.fi>
Cc:	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Two mailing lists

On Fri, May 13, 2016 at 10:22 AM, Joonas Saarinen <jza@...nalahti.fi> wrote:
> Shouldn't there be two Linux kernel mailing lists: one for patches, another
> one for discussion?

Why do you think so?
Patches should lead to discussions (review, etc..).
And discussions should lead to patches (being productive).

So, having two lists would be counterproductive.

-- 
Thanks,
//richard