lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Fri, 13 May 2016 11:00:37 +0200 From: Richard Weinberger <richard.weinberger@...il.com> To: Joonas Saarinen <jza@...nalahti.fi> Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org> Subject: Re: Two mailing lists On Fri, May 13, 2016 at 10:22 AM, Joonas Saarinen <jza@...nalahti.fi> wrote: > Shouldn't there be two Linux kernel mailing lists: one for patches, another > one for discussion? Why do you think so? Patches should lead to discussions (review, etc..). And discussions should lead to patches (being productive). So, having two lists would be counterproductive. -- Thanks, //richard
Powered by blists - more mailing lists