[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160513105115.GA16672@yury-N73SV>
Date: Fri, 13 May 2016 13:51:15 +0300
From: Yury Norov <ynorov@...iumnetworks.com>
To: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>
CC: "Zhangjian (Bamvor)" <bamvor.zhangjian@...wei.com>,
<linux-arch@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-s390@...r.kernel.org>,
Kefeng Wang <wangkefeng.wang@...wei.com>, <arnd@...db.de>,
<pinskia@...il.com>, <Prasun.Kapoor@...iumnetworks.com>,
<heiko.carstens@...ibm.com>, <broonie@...nel.org>,
<linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>, <Nathan_Lynch@...tor.com>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <agraf@...e.de>,
<klimov.linux@...il.com>, <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
<schwab@...e.de>, <schwidefsky@...ibm.com>,
<joseph@...esourcery.com>,
<christoph.muellner@...obroma-systems.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC6 PATCH v6 00/21] ILP32 for ARM64
On Fri, May 13, 2016 at 09:28:03AM +0000, Catalin Marinas wrote:
>
> The discussion is mainly around whether USER_DS for 32-bit compat apps
> should be the same as USER_DS for native 32-bit apps. Even for native
> 32-bit kernels, we don't use STACK_TOP as addr_limit. A read/write from
> 0xffffffff would fail in both cases anyway. I think the LTP test doesn't
> even try to access such memory but only to probe the range validity (I
> haven't managed to build the latest LTP yet).
This fix lets me build it (on top of 7b3ef3b0b)
Of course, it's not 'official'. :)
---
testcases/kernel/syscalls/fstatat/fstatat01.c | 1 +
testcases/kernel/syscalls/preadv/preadv.h | 1 +
testcases/kernel/syscalls/pwritev/pwritev.h | 1 +
testcases/kernel/syscalls/request_key/Makefile | 2 +-
4 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/testcases/kernel/syscalls/fstatat/fstatat01.c b/testcases/kernel/syscalls/fstatat/fstatat01.c
index 128f6dd..6e23c9e 100644
--- a/testcases/kernel/syscalls/fstatat/fstatat01.c
+++ b/testcases/kernel/syscalls/fstatat/fstatat01.c
@@ -59,6 +59,7 @@ static const char *filenames[TEST_CASES];
static const int expected_errno[] = { 0, 0, ENOTDIR, EBADF, EINVAL, 0 };
static const int flags[] = { 0, 0, 0, 0, 9999, 0 };
+#define HAVE_FSTATAT
#if !defined(HAVE_FSTATAT)
#if (__NR_fstatat64 > 0)
int fstatat(int dirfd, const char *filename, struct stat64 *statbuf, int flags)
diff --git a/testcases/kernel/syscalls/preadv/preadv.h b/testcases/kernel/syscalls/preadv/preadv.h
index f3ac30d..b001389 100644
--- a/testcases/kernel/syscalls/preadv/preadv.h
+++ b/testcases/kernel/syscalls/preadv/preadv.h
@@ -21,6 +21,7 @@
#include "config.h"
#include "linux_syscall_numbers.h"
+#define HAVE_PREADV
#if !defined(HAVE_PREADV)
int preadv(int fd, const struct iovec *iov, int iovcnt, off_t offset)
{
diff --git a/testcases/kernel/syscalls/pwritev/pwritev.h b/testcases/kernel/syscalls/pwritev/pwritev.h
index ae9d999..2a4d188 100644
--- a/testcases/kernel/syscalls/pwritev/pwritev.h
+++ b/testcases/kernel/syscalls/pwritev/pwritev.h
@@ -21,6 +21,7 @@
#include "config.h"
#include "linux_syscall_numbers.h"
+#define HAVE_PWRITEV
#if !defined(HAVE_PWRITEV)
int pwritev(int fd, const struct iovec *iov, int iovcnt, off_t offset)
{
diff --git a/testcases/kernel/syscalls/request_key/Makefile b/testcases/kernel/syscalls/request_key/Makefile
index 9add429..2e8a37c 100644
--- a/testcases/kernel/syscalls/request_key/Makefile
+++ b/testcases/kernel/syscalls/request_key/Makefile
@@ -19,6 +19,6 @@ top_srcdir ?= ../../../..
include $(top_srcdir)/include/mk/testcases.mk
-LDLIBS += $(KEYUTILS_LIBS)
+LDLIBS += $(lkeyutils)
include $(top_srcdir)/include/mk/generic_leaf_target.mk
--
2.5.0
>
> --
> Catalin
>
> _______________________________________________
> linux-arm-kernel mailing list
> linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
Powered by blists - more mailing lists