linux-kernel - Re: Use of deleted Kconfig option B43

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <87oa8ap1xm.fsf@purkki.adurom.net>
Date:	Fri, 13 May 2016 15:39:17 +0300
From:	Kalle Valo <kvalo@...eaurora.org>
To:	Rafał Miłecki <zajec5@...il.com>
Cc:	Andreas Ziegler <andreas.ziegler@....de>,
	b43-dev <b43-dev@...ts.infradead.org>,
	"linux-kernel\@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Use of deleted Kconfig option B43_PCMCIA

(Adding linux-wireless)

Rafał Miłecki <zajec5@...il.com> writes:

> On 26 January 2016 at 16:06, Andreas Ziegler <andreas.ziegler@....de> wrote:
>> your commit 399500da18f7 ("ssb: pick PCMCIA host code support from b43
>> driver") removed the Kconfig option B43_PCMCIA from Kconfig, but left
>> one reference to it in b43/main.c, inside the b43_print_driverinfo()
>> function.
>>
>> Can this #ifdef be removed, should it be replaced with an #ifdef using
>> CONFIG_SSB_PCMCIAHOST instead or should we do something entirely different?
>
> We even got patch for this, but it wasn't submitted correctly (didn't
> go to linux-wireless):
> https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/11/2/154

Nobody resubmitted that patch?

-- 
Kalle Valo