[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5735DBC9.10204@roeck-us.net>
Date: Fri, 13 May 2016 06:51:05 -0700
From: Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>
Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@...aro.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@...e.de>,
Mel Gorman <mgorman@...hsingularity.net>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ARM: hide finish_arch_post_lock_switch from modules
On 05/13/2016 06:30 AM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
>
> The introduction of switch_mm_irqs_off() brought back an old bug
> regarding the use of preempt_enable_no_resched:
>
> As part of 62b94a08da1b ("sched/preempt: Take away
> preempt_enable_no_resched() from modules"), the definition of
> preempt_enable_no_resched() is only available in built-in code,
> not in loadable modules, so we can't generally use it from header
> files. However, the ARM version of finish_arch_post_lock_switch()
> calls preempt_enable_no_resched() and is defined as a static
> inline function in asm/mmu_context.h. This in turn means we cannot
> include asm/mmu_context.h from modules.
>
> With today's tip tree, asm/mmu_context.h gets included from
> linux/mmu_context.h, which is normally the exact pattern one would
> expect, but unfortunately, linux/mmu_context.h can be included from
> the vhost driver that is a loadable module, now causing this compile
> time error:
>
> In file included from ../include/linux/mmu_context.h:4:0,
> from ../drivers/vhost/vhost.c:18:
> ../arch/arm/include/asm/mmu_context.h: In function 'finish_arch_post_lock_switch':
> ../arch/arm/include/asm/mmu_context.h:88:3: error: implicit declaration of function 'preempt_enable_no_resched' [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
> preempt_enable_no_resched();
>
> Andy already tried to fix the bug by including linux/preempt.h
> from asm/mmu_context.h, but that didn't help. I suggested reordering
> the header files, which wasn't popular, but Steve came up with this
> workaround instead:
>
> The finish_arch_post_lock_switch() definition is now also hidden
> inside of #ifdef MODULE, so we don't see anything referencing
> preempt_enable_no_resched() from a header file. I've built a
> few hundred randconfig kernels with this, and did not see any
> new problems.
>
> Fixes: f98db6013c55 ("sched/core: Add switch_mm_irqs_off() and use it in the scheduler")
> Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
> Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
> Acked-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@....linux.org.uk>
Tested-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
> ---
> arch/arm/include/asm/mmu_context.h | 2 ++
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/include/asm/mmu_context.h b/arch/arm/include/asm/mmu_context.h
> index ed73babc0dc9..3cc14dd8587c 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/include/asm/mmu_context.h
> +++ b/arch/arm/include/asm/mmu_context.h
> @@ -67,6 +67,7 @@ static inline void check_and_switch_context(struct mm_struct *mm,
> cpu_switch_mm(mm->pgd, mm);
> }
>
> +#ifndef MODULE
> #define finish_arch_post_lock_switch \
> finish_arch_post_lock_switch
> static inline void finish_arch_post_lock_switch(void)
> @@ -88,6 +89,7 @@ static inline void finish_arch_post_lock_switch(void)
> preempt_enable_no_resched();
> }
> }
> +#endif /* !MODULE */
>
> #endif /* CONFIG_MMU */
>
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists