lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160513031020.GA12467@gondor.apana.org.au>
Date:	Fri, 13 May 2016 11:10:21 +0800
From:	Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>
To:	Megha Dey <megha.dey@...ux.intel.com>
Cc:	linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: SHA1-MB algorithm broken on latest kernel

On Thu, May 12, 2016 at 04:31:06PM -0700, Megha Dey wrote:
> Hi,
>  
> When booting latest kernel with the CONFIG_CRYPTO_SHA1_MB enabled, I
> observe a panic.
>  
> After having a quick look, on reverting the following patches, I am able
> to complete the booting process.
> aec4d0e301f17bb143341c82cc44685b8af0b945
> 8691ccd764f9ecc69a6812dfe76214c86ac9ba06
> 68874ac3304ade7ed5ebb12af00d6b9bbbca0a16
>  
> Of the 3 patches, aec4d0e301f17bb143341c82cc44685b8af0b945 seems wrong.
> The r10 to r15 registers are used in sha1_x8_avx2.S, which is called
> from sha1_mb_mgr_flush_avx2.S.
>  
> I do not think the functionality of the SHA1-MB crypto algorithm has
> been tested after applying these changes. (I am not sure if any of the
> other crypto algorithms have been affected by these changes).

Josh, Ingo:

Any ideas on this? Should we revert?

Thanks,
-- 
Email: Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>
Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/
PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ