[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1647746.RHuiZHceXs@phil>
Date: Sat, 14 May 2016 00:14:40 +0200
From: Heiko Stuebner <heiko@...ech.de>
To: Brian Norris <briannorris@...omium.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-rockchip@...ts.infradead.org,
Doug Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>,
Shawn Lin <shawn.lin@...k-chips.com>,
Brian Norris <computersforpeace@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] ARM64: dts: rockchip: add sdhci/emmc for rk3399
Am Freitag, 13. Mai 2016, 14:57:24 schrieb Brian Norris:
> On Fri, May 13, 2016 at 11:47:57PM +0200, Heiko Stuebner wrote:
> > Am Donnerstag, 12. Mai 2016, 15:35:51 schrieb Brian Norris:
> > > Add description for the SDHCI v5.1 eMMC controller on rk3399. Fix it
> > > to
> > > 200 MHz, to support all supported timing modes.
> > >
> > > Note that 'rockchip,rk3399-sdhci-5.1' is not documented; we presumably
> > > have a compliant Arasan controller, but let's have a rockchip property
> > > as the canonical backup/precautionary measure. Per Heiko's previous
> > > suggestion, let's not clutter the arasan doc with it.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Brian Norris <briannorris@...omium.org>
> >
> > At least one split is necessary.
> > So please at least split out the simple-mfd addition into a separate
> > patch
> Will do.
>
> BTW, should this be noted in
> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/soc/rockchip/grf.txt now?
The simple-mfd is already documented in mfd/mfd.txt in a general way, so I
don't think every instance needs to have that, especially as it mainly
affects sub-nodes alone.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists