linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] sched/core: don't include asm/mmu

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CALCETrV_wgy0vpWiLYRJn1Q41C6adKKgbEOFthoAXiG601JPYQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Thu, 12 May 2016 22:46:56 -0700
From:	Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>
To:	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
	Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
Cc:	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
	Russell King <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
	Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
	Borislav Petkov <bp@...e.de>,
	Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@...aro.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
	Mel Gorman <mgorman@...hsingularity.net>,
	"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" 
	<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sched/core: don't include asm/mmu_context from drivers

On Fri, Apr 29, 2016 at 6:42 AM, Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org> wrote:
> On Fri, 29 Apr 2016 10:52:32 +0200
> Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de> wrote:
>
>> This reverts the earlier fix attempt and works around the problem
>> by including both linux/mmu_context.h and asm/mmu_context.h from
>> kernel/sched/core.c. This is not a good solution but seems less
>> hacky than the alternatives.
>
> What about simply not compiling finish_arch_post_lock_switch() when
> building modules?
>
> (untested, not compiled or anything)
>
> Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
> ---
> diff --git a/arch/arm/include/asm/mmu_context.h b/arch/arm/include/asm/mmu_context.h
> index fa5b42d44985..3f22d1b6bac8 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/include/asm/mmu_context.h
> +++ b/arch/arm/include/asm/mmu_context.h
> @@ -66,6 +66,7 @@ static inline void check_and_switch_context(struct mm_struct *mm,
>                 cpu_switch_mm(mm->pgd, mm);
>  }
>
> +#ifndef MODULE
>  #define finish_arch_post_lock_switch \
>         finish_arch_post_lock_switch
>  static inline void finish_arch_post_lock_switch(void)
> @@ -87,6 +88,7 @@ static inline void finish_arch_post_lock_switch(void)
>                 preempt_enable_no_resched();
>         }
>  }
> +#endif /* !MODULE */
>
>  #endif /* CONFIG_MMU */
>


Can someone in arm land ack this so Ingo can apply it?

--Andy

-- 
Andy Lutomirski
AMA Capital Management, LLC