linux-kernel - Re: Unclear BSD licensing (headers, MODULE

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20160515153929.GC9021@lunn.ch>
Date:	Sun, 15 May 2016 17:39:29 +0200
From:	Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
To:	Rafa?? Mi??ecki <zajec5@...il.com>
Cc:	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
	Dan Haab <dhaab@...ul.com>,
	Florian Fainelli <florian@...nwrt.org>,
	"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" 
	<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
	Hauke Mehrtens <hauke@...ke-m.de>
Subject: Re: Unclear BSD licensing (headers, MODULE_LICENSE, versions)

On Sun, May 15, 2016 at 12:44:35AM +0200, Rafa?? Mi??ecki wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> I recently received a hint that it would be nice/expected to have DTS
> files licensed under BSD.

I've not done a count, but i think you will find that most device tree
files use X11 as the second license, not BSD.

      Andrew