lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Mon, 16 May 2016 10:16:06 +1000
From:	Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To:	Kalle Valo <kvalo@...eaurora.org>,
	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Cc:	linux-next@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: linux-next: manual merge of the wireless-drivers-next tree with the
 net-next tree

Hi Kalle,

Today's linux-next merge of the wireless-drivers-next tree got a
conflict in:

  drivers/net/wireless/intel/iwlwifi/mvm/tx.c

between commit:

  909b27f70643 ("Merge git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/davem/net")

from the net-next tree and commit:

  a525d0eab17d ("Merge tag 'iwlwifi-for-kalle-2016-05-04' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/iwlwifi/iwlwifi-fixes")

from the wireless-drivers-next tree.

I fixed it up (I think that the net-next tree merge lost the changes
to iwl_mvm_set_tx_cmd() associated with commit 5c08b0f5026f ("iwlwifi:
mvm: don't override the rate with the AMSDU len")) and can carry the
fix as necessary. This is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned,
but any non trivial conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream
maintainer when your tree is submitted for merging.  You may also want
to consider cooperating with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to
minimise any particularly complex conflicts.

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell

Powered by blists - more mailing lists