[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.10.1605161221350.2494@sstabellini-ThinkPad-X260>
Date: Mon, 16 May 2016 12:23:27 +0100 (BST)
From: Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@...nel.org>
To: Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@...cle.com>
cc: David Vrabel <david.vrabel@...rix.com>,
Juergen Gross <jgross@...e.com>,
Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@...nel.org>,
Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@...cle.com>,
xen-devel@...ts.xenproject.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] xen/x86: actually allocate legacy interrupts
on PV guests
On Wed, 27 Apr 2016, Boris Ostrovsky wrote:
> On 04/27/2016 09:40 AM, David Vrabel wrote:
> > On 27/04/16 14:38, Boris Ostrovsky wrote:
> > > int xen_nr_legacy_irqs()
> > > {
> > > if (xen_hvm_domain())
> > > return nr_legacy_irqs();
> > > if (xen_initial_domain())
> > > return NR_IRQS_LEGACY;
> > > return 0;
> > > }
> > Yeah, if that does the right thing...
>
> I think it will break xen_allocate_irq_gsi() again, unless we check for HVM
> domain explicitly. Which would be ugly.
I guess we all forgot about this patch, in the meantime the merge window
has opened.
Should we go ahead with:
http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=146115812124261&w=2
?
It might not be complete, but it is certainly an improvement.
Otherwise, please submit proper patches ASAP. I don't think we want to
delay this fix until 4.8.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists