lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Mon, 16 May 2016 13:48:23 -0400 (EDT) From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net> To: vivien.didelot@...oirfairelinux.com Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kernel@...oirfairelinux.com, andrew@...n.ch, f.fainelli@...il.com, jiri@...nulli.us Subject: Re: [PATCH net] net: dsa: mv88e6xxx: remove bridge work From: Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@...oirfairelinux.com> Date: Fri, 13 May 2016 21:28:28 -0400 > Hi David, > > Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@...oirfairelinux.com> writes: > >> Now that the bridge code defers the switchdev port state setting, there >> is no need to defer the port STP state change within the mv88e6xxx code. >> Thus get rid of the driver's bridge work code. >> >> This also fixes a race condition where the DSA layer assumes that the >> bridge code already set the unbridged port's STP state to Disabled >> before restoring the Forwarding state. >> >> As a consequence, this also fixes the FDB flush for the unbridged port >> which now correctly occurs during the Forwarding to Disabled transition. >> >> Fixes: 0bc05d585d38 ("switchdev: allow caller to explicitly request attr_set as deferred") >> Reported-by: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch> >> Signed-off-by: Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@...oirfairelinux.com> > > This patch doesn't apply to -net, only applies to net-next... > > How should I handle that, do I resend a patch for net-next with the good > subject prefix, and a v2 for -net? I applied this to net-next, thanks.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists