lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Mon, 16 May 2016 16:38:09 -0400
From:	Luiz Capitulino <lcapitulino@...hat.com>
To:	Daniel Wagner <wagi@...om.org>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-rt-users@...r.kernel.org,
	"Peter Zijlstra (Intel)" <peterz@...radead.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>,
	Daniel Wagner <daniel.wagner@...-carit.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] sched/completion: convert completions to use simple
 wait queues

On Thu, 12 May 2016 16:08:34 +0200
Daniel Wagner <wagi@...om.org> wrote:

> In short, I haven't figured out yet why the kernel builds get slightly slower. 

You're doing make -j 200, right? How many cores do you have? Couldn't it
be that you're saturating your CPUs?

You could try make -j<NR CPUs>, or some process creation benchmark. Although
I don't know what's the best way to measure this.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists