[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160516224058.GJ98477@stormcage.americas.sgi.com>
Date: Mon, 16 May 2016 17:40:58 -0500
From: Alex Thorlton <athorlton@....com>
To: Alex Thorlton <athorlton@....com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Matt Fleming <matt@...eblueprint.co.uk>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] EFI fix
On Mon, May 16, 2016 at 03:23:51PM -0500, Alex Thorlton wrote:
> Everything discussed above makes sense to me, and the patch looks sane.
> I will apply and test it today and let you know how it works.
I applied this to the latest -tip kernel and tested on both real
hardware and in our simulator. Everything appears to be behaving as
expected.
I still need to work on the other patch in the patchset to get our
callbacks working with the new EFI page tables, but I believe we have a
clear path forward there, and that is (mostly) a separate issue.
Thanks again for catching this mistake, Linus!
- Alex
Powered by blists - more mailing lists