linux-kernel - [PATCH 4.5 022/101] bpf: fix check_map_func

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 16 May 2016 18:20:27 -0700
From:	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
	stable@...r.kernel.org, Jann Horn <jannh@...gle.com>,
	Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
	Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>
Subject: [PATCH 4.5 022/101] bpf: fix check_map_func_compatibility logic

4.5-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...com>

[ Upstream commit 6aff67c85c9e5a4bc99e5211c1bac547936626ca ]

The commit 35578d798400 ("bpf: Implement function bpf_perf_event_read() that get the selected hardware PMU conuter")
introduced clever way to check bpf_helper<->map_type compatibility.
Later on commit a43eec304259 ("bpf: introduce bpf_perf_event_output() helper") adjusted
the logic and inadvertently broke it.
Get rid of the clever bool compare and go back to two-way check
from map and from helper perspective.

Fixes: a43eec304259 ("bpf: introduce bpf_perf_event_output() helper")
Reported-by: Jann Horn <jannh@...gle.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
---
 kernel/bpf/verifier.c |   53 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------------
 1 file changed, 32 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)

--- a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
@@ -239,15 +239,6 @@ static const char * const reg_type_str[]
 	[CONST_IMM]		= "imm",
 };
 
-static const struct {
-	int map_type;
-	int func_id;
-} func_limit[] = {
-	{BPF_MAP_TYPE_PROG_ARRAY, BPF_FUNC_tail_call},
-	{BPF_MAP_TYPE_PERF_EVENT_ARRAY, BPF_FUNC_perf_event_read},
-	{BPF_MAP_TYPE_PERF_EVENT_ARRAY, BPF_FUNC_perf_event_output},
-};
-
 static void print_verifier_state(struct verifier_env *env)
 {
 	enum bpf_reg_type t;
@@ -898,24 +889,44 @@ static int check_func_arg(struct verifie
 
 static int check_map_func_compatibility(struct bpf_map *map, int func_id)
 {
-	bool bool_map, bool_func;
-	int i;
-
 	if (!map)
 		return 0;
 
-	for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(func_limit); i++) {
-		bool_map = (map->map_type == func_limit[i].map_type);
-		bool_func = (func_id == func_limit[i].func_id);
-		/* only when map & func pair match it can continue.
-		 * don't allow any other map type to be passed into
-		 * the special func;
-		 */
-		if (bool_func && bool_map != bool_func)
-			return -EINVAL;
+	/* We need a two way check, first is from map perspective ... */
+	switch (map->map_type) {
+	case BPF_MAP_TYPE_PROG_ARRAY:
+		if (func_id != BPF_FUNC_tail_call)
+			goto error;
+		break;
+	case BPF_MAP_TYPE_PERF_EVENT_ARRAY:
+		if (func_id != BPF_FUNC_perf_event_read &&
+		    func_id != BPF_FUNC_perf_event_output)
+			goto error;
+		break;
+	default:
+		break;
+	}
+
+	/* ... and second from the function itself. */
+	switch (func_id) {
+	case BPF_FUNC_tail_call:
+		if (map->map_type != BPF_MAP_TYPE_PROG_ARRAY)
+			goto error;
+		break;
+	case BPF_FUNC_perf_event_read:
+	case BPF_FUNC_perf_event_output:
+		if (map->map_type != BPF_MAP_TYPE_PERF_EVENT_ARRAY)
+			goto error;
+		break;
+	default:
+		break;
 	}
 
 	return 0;
+error:
+	verbose("cannot pass map_type %d into func %d\n",
+		map->map_type, func_id);
+	return -EINVAL;
 }
 
 static int check_call(struct verifier_env *env, int func_id)