| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-Id: <1463441786-32224-1-git-send-email-yang.shi@linaro.org>
Date: Mon, 16 May 2016 16:36:26 -0700
From: Yang Shi <yang.shi@...aro.org>
To: ast@...nel.org, davem@...emloft.net
Cc: will.deacon@....com, catalin.marinas@....com, daniel@...earbox.net,
zlim.lnx@...il.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linaro-kernel@...ts.linaro.org, yang.shi@...aro.org
Subject: [PATCH v2 net-next] bpf: arm64: remove callee-save registers use for tmp registers
In the current implementation of ARM64 eBPF JIT, R23 and R24 are used for
tmp registers, which are callee-saved registers. This leads to variable size
of JIT prologue and epilogue. The latest blinding constant change prefers to
constant size of prologue and epilogue. AAPCS reserves R9 ~ R15 for temp
registers which not need to be saved/restored during function call. So, replace
R23 and R24 to R10 and R11, and remove tmp_used flag to save 2 instructions for
some jited BPF program.
CC: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>
Acked-by: Zi Shen Lim <zlim.lnx@...il.com>
Signed-off-by: Yang Shi <yang.shi@...aro.org>
---
Changelog v1 --> v2:
* Updated stack diagram
* Added the comment from Zi for the commit log
* Added Zi's Acked-by
Apply on top of Daniel's blinding constant patchset
arch/arm64/net/bpf_jit_comp.c | 34 +++++-----------------------------
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 29 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm64/net/bpf_jit_comp.c b/arch/arm64/net/bpf_jit_comp.c
index d0d5190..49ba37e 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/net/bpf_jit_comp.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/net/bpf_jit_comp.c
@@ -51,9 +51,9 @@ static const int bpf2a64[] = {
[BPF_REG_9] = A64_R(22),
/* read-only frame pointer to access stack */
[BPF_REG_FP] = A64_R(25),
- /* temporary register for internal BPF JIT */
- [TMP_REG_1] = A64_R(23),
- [TMP_REG_2] = A64_R(24),
+ /* temporary registers for internal BPF JIT */
+ [TMP_REG_1] = A64_R(10),
+ [TMP_REG_2] = A64_R(11),
/* temporary register for blinding constants */
[BPF_REG_AX] = A64_R(9),
};
@@ -61,7 +61,6 @@ static const int bpf2a64[] = {
struct jit_ctx {
const struct bpf_prog *prog;
int idx;
- int tmp_used;
int epilogue_offset;
int *offset;
u32 *image;
@@ -154,8 +153,6 @@ static void build_prologue(struct jit_ctx *ctx)
const u8 r8 = bpf2a64[BPF_REG_8];
const u8 r9 = bpf2a64[BPF_REG_9];
const u8 fp = bpf2a64[BPF_REG_FP];
- const u8 tmp1 = bpf2a64[TMP_REG_1];
- const u8 tmp2 = bpf2a64[TMP_REG_2];
/*
* BPF prog stack layout
@@ -167,7 +164,7 @@ static void build_prologue(struct jit_ctx *ctx)
* | ... | callee saved registers
* +-----+
* | | x25/x26
- * BPF fp register => -80:+-----+ <= (BPF_FP)
+ * BPF fp register => -64:+-----+ <= (BPF_FP)
* | |
* | ... | BPF prog stack
* | |
@@ -189,8 +186,6 @@ static void build_prologue(struct jit_ctx *ctx)
/* Save callee-saved register */
emit(A64_PUSH(r6, r7, A64_SP), ctx);
emit(A64_PUSH(r8, r9, A64_SP), ctx);
- if (ctx->tmp_used)
- emit(A64_PUSH(tmp1, tmp2, A64_SP), ctx);
/* Save fp (x25) and x26. SP requires 16 bytes alignment */
emit(A64_PUSH(fp, A64_R(26), A64_SP), ctx);
@@ -210,8 +205,6 @@ static void build_epilogue(struct jit_ctx *ctx)
const u8 r8 = bpf2a64[BPF_REG_8];
const u8 r9 = bpf2a64[BPF_REG_9];
const u8 fp = bpf2a64[BPF_REG_FP];
- const u8 tmp1 = bpf2a64[TMP_REG_1];
- const u8 tmp2 = bpf2a64[TMP_REG_2];
/* We're done with BPF stack */
emit(A64_ADD_I(1, A64_SP, A64_SP, STACK_SIZE), ctx);
@@ -220,8 +213,6 @@ static void build_epilogue(struct jit_ctx *ctx)
emit(A64_POP(fp, A64_R(26), A64_SP), ctx);
/* Restore callee-saved register */
- if (ctx->tmp_used)
- emit(A64_POP(tmp1, tmp2, A64_SP), ctx);
emit(A64_POP(r8, r9, A64_SP), ctx);
emit(A64_POP(r6, r7, A64_SP), ctx);
@@ -317,7 +308,6 @@ static int build_insn(const struct bpf_insn *insn, struct jit_ctx *ctx)
emit(A64_UDIV(is64, dst, dst, src), ctx);
break;
case BPF_MOD:
- ctx->tmp_used = 1;
emit(A64_UDIV(is64, tmp, dst, src), ctx);
emit(A64_MUL(is64, tmp, tmp, src), ctx);
emit(A64_SUB(is64, dst, dst, tmp), ctx);
@@ -390,49 +380,41 @@ emit_bswap_uxt:
/* dst = dst OP imm */
case BPF_ALU | BPF_ADD | BPF_K:
case BPF_ALU64 | BPF_ADD | BPF_K:
- ctx->tmp_used = 1;
emit_a64_mov_i(is64, tmp, imm, ctx);
emit(A64_ADD(is64, dst, dst, tmp), ctx);
break;
case BPF_ALU | BPF_SUB | BPF_K:
case BPF_ALU64 | BPF_SUB | BPF_K:
- ctx->tmp_used = 1;
emit_a64_mov_i(is64, tmp, imm, ctx);
emit(A64_SUB(is64, dst, dst, tmp), ctx);
break;
case BPF_ALU | BPF_AND | BPF_K:
case BPF_ALU64 | BPF_AND | BPF_K:
- ctx->tmp_used = 1;
emit_a64_mov_i(is64, tmp, imm, ctx);
emit(A64_AND(is64, dst, dst, tmp), ctx);
break;
case BPF_ALU | BPF_OR | BPF_K:
case BPF_ALU64 | BPF_OR | BPF_K:
- ctx->tmp_used = 1;
emit_a64_mov_i(is64, tmp, imm, ctx);
emit(A64_ORR(is64, dst, dst, tmp), ctx);
break;
case BPF_ALU | BPF_XOR | BPF_K:
case BPF_ALU64 | BPF_XOR | BPF_K:
- ctx->tmp_used = 1;
emit_a64_mov_i(is64, tmp, imm, ctx);
emit(A64_EOR(is64, dst, dst, tmp), ctx);
break;
case BPF_ALU | BPF_MUL | BPF_K:
case BPF_ALU64 | BPF_MUL | BPF_K:
- ctx->tmp_used = 1;
emit_a64_mov_i(is64, tmp, imm, ctx);
emit(A64_MUL(is64, dst, dst, tmp), ctx);
break;
case BPF_ALU | BPF_DIV | BPF_K:
case BPF_ALU64 | BPF_DIV | BPF_K:
- ctx->tmp_used = 1;
emit_a64_mov_i(is64, tmp, imm, ctx);
emit(A64_UDIV(is64, dst, dst, tmp), ctx);
break;
case BPF_ALU | BPF_MOD | BPF_K:
case BPF_ALU64 | BPF_MOD | BPF_K:
- ctx->tmp_used = 1;
emit_a64_mov_i(is64, tmp2, imm, ctx);
emit(A64_UDIV(is64, tmp, dst, tmp2), ctx);
emit(A64_MUL(is64, tmp, tmp, tmp2), ctx);
@@ -503,12 +485,10 @@ emit_cond_jmp:
case BPF_JMP | BPF_JNE | BPF_K:
case BPF_JMP | BPF_JSGT | BPF_K:
case BPF_JMP | BPF_JSGE | BPF_K:
- ctx->tmp_used = 1;
emit_a64_mov_i(1, tmp, imm, ctx);
emit(A64_CMP(1, dst, tmp), ctx);
goto emit_cond_jmp;
case BPF_JMP | BPF_JSET | BPF_K:
- ctx->tmp_used = 1;
emit_a64_mov_i(1, tmp, imm, ctx);
emit(A64_TST(1, dst, tmp), ctx);
goto emit_cond_jmp;
@@ -518,7 +498,6 @@ emit_cond_jmp:
const u8 r0 = bpf2a64[BPF_REG_0];
const u64 func = (u64)__bpf_call_base + imm;
- ctx->tmp_used = 1;
emit_a64_mov_i64(tmp, func, ctx);
emit(A64_PUSH(A64_FP, A64_LR, A64_SP), ctx);
emit(A64_MOV(1, A64_FP, A64_SP), ctx);
@@ -564,7 +543,6 @@ emit_cond_jmp:
case BPF_LDX | BPF_MEM | BPF_H:
case BPF_LDX | BPF_MEM | BPF_B:
case BPF_LDX | BPF_MEM | BPF_DW:
- ctx->tmp_used = 1;
emit_a64_mov_i(1, tmp, off, ctx);
switch (BPF_SIZE(code)) {
case BPF_W:
@@ -588,7 +566,6 @@ emit_cond_jmp:
case BPF_ST | BPF_MEM | BPF_B:
case BPF_ST | BPF_MEM | BPF_DW:
/* Load imm to a register then store it */
- ctx->tmp_used = 1;
emit_a64_mov_i(1, tmp2, off, ctx);
emit_a64_mov_i(1, tmp, imm, ctx);
switch (BPF_SIZE(code)) {
@@ -612,7 +589,6 @@ emit_cond_jmp:
case BPF_STX | BPF_MEM | BPF_H:
case BPF_STX | BPF_MEM | BPF_B:
case BPF_STX | BPF_MEM | BPF_DW:
- ctx->tmp_used = 1;
emit_a64_mov_i(1, tmp, off, ctx);
switch (BPF_SIZE(code)) {
case BPF_W:
@@ -798,7 +774,7 @@ struct bpf_prog *bpf_int_jit_compile(struct bpf_prog *prog)
/* 1. Initial fake pass to compute ctx->idx. */
- /* Fake pass to fill in ctx->offset and ctx->tmp_used. */
+ /* Fake pass to fill in ctx->offset. */
if (build_body(&ctx)) {
prog = orig_prog;
goto out_off;
--
2.0.2
Powered by blists - more mailing lists