linux-kernel - Re: linux-next: manual merge of the net-next tree with the arm64 tree

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <573AC462.7070809@iogearbox.net>
Date:	Tue, 17 May 2016 09:12:34 +0200
From:	Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>
To:	Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>,
	Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
CC:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
	"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
	Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
	Linux-Next <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Yang Shi <yang.shi@...aro.org>,
	Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the net-next tree with the arm64
 tree

On 05/17/2016 09:03 AM, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
[...]
> Someone's not gonna be happy with commit 6077776b5908 ("bpf: split
> HAVE_BPF_JIT into cBPF and eBPF variant") breaking the sort order again...

Wasn't aware of that. Maybe I'm missing something, but there appears
to be no throughout consistent ordering ...

[...]
         select HAVE_PERF_REGS
         select HAVE_PERF_USER_STACK_DUMP
         select HAVE_RCU_TABLE_FREE
         select HAVE_SYSCALL_TRACEPOINTS
         select IOMMU_DMA if IOMMU_SUPPORT
         select IRQ_DOMAIN
         select IRQ_FORCED_THREADING
[...]
         select RTC_LIB
         select SPARSE_IRQ
         select SYSCTL_EXCEPTION_TRACE
         select HAVE_CONTEXT_TRACKING
         select HAVE_ARM_SMCCC
[...]