linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v12 01/10] arm64: Add HAVE_REGS_AND_STACK_ACCESS

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 17 May 2016 17:14:47 +0800
From:	Huang Shijie <shijie.huang@....com>
To:	David Long <dave.long@...aro.org>
CC:	Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
	Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
	Sandeepa Prabhu <sandeepa.s.prabhu@...il.com>,
	William Cohen <wcohen@...hat.com>,
	Pratyush Anand <panand@...hat.com>,
	Steve Capper <steve.capper@...aro.org>,
	<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
	<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@....com>,
	Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
	Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>,
	Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>,
	John Blackwood <john.blackwood@...r.com>,
	Feng Kan <fkan@....com>, Zi Shen Lim <zlim.lnx@...il.com>,
	Dave P Martin <Dave.Martin@....com>,
	Yang Shi <yang.shi@...aro.org>,
	Vladimir Murzin <Vladimir.Murzin@....com>,
	Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
	"Suzuki K. Poulose" <suzuki.poulose@....com>,
	Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
	Alex Bennée <alex.bennee@...aro.org>,
	Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@...aro.org>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
	Mark Salyzyn <salyzyn@...roid.com>,
	James Morse <james.morse@....com>,
	Christoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@...aro.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Robin Murphy <Robin.Murphy@....com>,
	Jens Wiklander <jens.wiklander@...aro.org>,
	Balamurugan Shanmugam <bshanmugam@....com>, <nd@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v12 01/10] arm64: Add HAVE_REGS_AND_STACK_ACCESS_API
 feature

On Wed, Apr 27, 2016 at 02:52:56PM -0400, David Long wrote:
> From: "David A. Long" <dave.long@...aro.org>
> +/**
> + * regs_within_kernel_stack() - check the address in the stack
> + * @regs:      pt_regs which contains kernel stack pointer.
> + * @addr:      address which is checked.
> + *
> + * regs_within_kernel_stack() checks @addr is within the kernel stack page(s).
> + * If @addr is within the kernel stack, it returns true. If not, returns false.
> + */
> +bool regs_within_kernel_stack(struct pt_regs *regs, unsigned long addr)
> +{
> +	return ((addr & ~(THREAD_SIZE - 1))  ==
> +		(kernel_stack_pointer(regs) & ~(THREAD_SIZE - 1))) ||
> +		on_irq_stack(addr, raw_smp_processor_id());
> +}
> +
> +/**
> + * regs_get_kernel_stack_nth() - get Nth entry of the stack
> + * @regs:	pt_regs which contains kernel stack pointer.
> + * @n:		stack entry number.
> + *
> + * regs_get_kernel_stack_nth() returns @n th entry of the kernel stack which
> + * is specified by @regs. If the @n th entry is NOT in the kernel stack,
> + * this returns 0.
> + */
> +unsigned long regs_get_kernel_stack_nth(struct pt_regs *regs, unsigned int n)
> +{
> +	unsigned long *addr = (unsigned long *)kernel_stack_pointer(regs);
> +
> +	addr += n;
> +	if (regs_within_kernel_stack(regs, (unsigned long)addr))
If the @addr fall in the interrupt stack, the regs_within_kernel_stack()
will return true. But Is it what we want?

thanks
Huang Shijie