lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <tip-2e636d5e66c35dfcbaf617aa8fa963f6847478fe@git.kernel.org>
Date:	Tue, 17 May 2016 07:21:40 -0700
From:	tip-bot for Peter Zijlstra <tipbot@...or.com>
To:	linux-tip-commits@...r.kernel.org
Cc:	mingo@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	markivx@...eaurora.org, peterz@...radead.org, hpa@...or.com,
	tglx@...utronix.de, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org
Subject: [tip:sched/urgent] sched/preempt: Fix preempt_count manipulations

Commit-ID:  2e636d5e66c35dfcbaf617aa8fa963f6847478fe
Gitweb:     http://git.kernel.org/tip/2e636d5e66c35dfcbaf617aa8fa963f6847478fe
Author:     Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
AuthorDate: Mon, 16 May 2016 15:01:11 +0200
Committer:  Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
CommitDate: Tue, 17 May 2016 12:24:21 +0200

sched/preempt: Fix preempt_count manipulations

Vikram reported that his ARM64 compiler managed to 'optimize' away the
preempt_count manipulations in code like:

	preempt_enable_no_resched();
	put_user();
	preempt_disable();

Irrespective of that fact that that is horrible code that should be
fixed for many reasons, it does highlight a deficiency in the generic
preempt_count manipulators. As it is never right to combine/elide
preempt_count manipulations like this.

Therefore sprinkle some volatile in the two generic accessors to
ensure the compiler is aware of the fact that the preempt_count is
observed outside of the regular program-order view and thus cannot be
optimized away like this.

x86; the only arch not using the generic code is not affected as we
do all this in asm in order to use the segment base per-cpu stuff.

Reported-by: Vikram Mulukutla <markivx@...eaurora.org>
Tested-by: Vikram Mulukutla <markivx@...eaurora.org>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Fixes: a787870924db ("sched, arch: Create asm/preempt.h")
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20160516131751.GH3205@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
---
 include/asm-generic/preempt.h | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/asm-generic/preempt.h b/include/asm-generic/preempt.h
index 5d8ffa3..c1cde35 100644
--- a/include/asm-generic/preempt.h
+++ b/include/asm-generic/preempt.h
@@ -7,10 +7,10 @@
 
 static __always_inline int preempt_count(void)
 {
-	return current_thread_info()->preempt_count;
+	return READ_ONCE(current_thread_info()->preempt_count);
 }
 
-static __always_inline int *preempt_count_ptr(void)
+static __always_inline volatile int *preempt_count_ptr(void)
 {
 	return &current_thread_info()->preempt_count;
 }

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ