[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160517165304.GA19976@obsidianresearch.com>
Date: Tue, 17 May 2016 10:53:04 -0600
From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgunthorpe@...idianresearch.com>
To: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: andrew.zamansky@...oton.com, tpmdd-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] tpm: Factor out common startup code
On Tue, May 17, 2016 at 07:15:57AM +0300, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> On Mon, May 16, 2016 at 12:25:47PM -0600, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> > Provide some flags in tpm_class_ops to allow drivers to opt-in to the
> > common startup sequence. This is the sequence used by tpm_tis and
> > tpm_crb.
> >
> > All drivers should set this flag.
>
> The commit message should be a much much more verbose I cannot include
> this without a better explanation. Please update this for the next
> revision.
What more description do you want to see?
> > + if (chip->ops->flags & TPM_OPS_PROBE_TPM2) {
> > + rc = tpm2_probe(chip);
> > + if (rc)
> > + return rc;
> > + }
>
> Dead code.
Yes, this is used by the follow on driver updates. Andrew is going to
be sending a patch that uses it right away. I don't really care if it
gets shifted to that patch or not..
Jason
Powered by blists - more mailing lists