[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20160517011509.849513892@linuxfoundation.org>
Date: Mon, 16 May 2016 18:21:30 -0700
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
stable@...r.kernel.org, Josef Bacik <jbacik@...com>,
David Sterba <dsterba@...e.com>
Subject: [PATCH 4.5 085/101] Btrfs: fix truncate_space_check
4.5-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Josef Bacik <jbacik@...com>
commit dc95f7bfc57fa4b75a77d0da84d5db249d74aa3f upstream.
truncate_space_check is using btrfs_csum_bytes_to_leaves() but forgetting to
multiply by nodesize so we get an actual byte count. We need a tracepoint here
so that we have the matching reserve for the release that will come later. Also
add a comment to make clear what the intent of truncate_space_check is.
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@...com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@...e.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
---
fs/btrfs/inode.c | 11 ++++++++++-
1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
--- a/fs/btrfs/inode.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/inode.c
@@ -4211,11 +4211,20 @@ static int truncate_space_check(struct b
{
int ret;
+ /*
+ * This is only used to apply pressure to the enospc system, we don't
+ * intend to use this reservation at all.
+ */
bytes_deleted = btrfs_csum_bytes_to_leaves(root, bytes_deleted);
+ bytes_deleted *= root->nodesize;
ret = btrfs_block_rsv_add(root, &root->fs_info->trans_block_rsv,
bytes_deleted, BTRFS_RESERVE_NO_FLUSH);
- if (!ret)
+ if (!ret) {
+ trace_btrfs_space_reservation(root->fs_info, "transaction",
+ trans->transid,
+ bytes_deleted, 1);
trans->bytes_reserved += bytes_deleted;
+ }
return ret;
}
Powered by blists - more mailing lists