linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/5] add bus driver for Unisys s-Par paravirtualized devices to arch/x86

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 17 May 2016 19:49:53 -0400
From:	Jes Sorensen <Jes.Sorensen@...hat.com>
To:	Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc:	David Kershner <david.kershner@...sys.com>, corbet@....net,
	tglx@...utronix.de, mingo@...hat.com, hpa@...or.com,
	erik.arfvidson@...sys.com, timothy.sell@...sys.com,
	hofrat@...dl.org, dzickus@...hat.com, alexander.curtin@...sys.com,
	janani.rvchndrn@...il.com, sudipm.mukherjee@...il.com,
	prarit@...hat.com, david.binder@...sys.com, nhorman@...hat.com,
	dan.j.williams@...el.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, driverdev-devel@...uxdriverproject.org,
	sparmaintainer@...sys.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5] add bus driver for Unisys s-Par paravirtualized devices to arch/x86

Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org> writes:
> On Tue, May 17, 2016 at 10:01:55AM -0400, Jes Sorensen wrote:
>> Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org> writes:
>> > On Tue, May 17, 2016 at 03:27:56AM -0400, David Kershner wrote:
>> >> This patchset moves the visorbus driver
>> >> (fromdrivers/staging/unisys/visorbus)
>> >> and its dependent headers files (from drivers/staging/unisys/include)
>> >> out of staging into the main kernel tree.
>> >> 
>> >> The visorbus driver is a bus driver for various paravirtualized devices
>> >> presented within a Unisys s-Par guest environment.  Drivers for these
>> >> devices are also currently present under drivers/staging/unisys/, which we
>> >> intend to also move out of staging immediately after visorbus.  All of
>> >> these other drivers are dependent upon visorbus and the include directory,
>> >> which is why we would like to move these first.
>> >> 
>> >> Our initial consultations with various members of the community have led us
>> >> to the conclusion that the most appropriate locations for these is:
>> >>     arch/x86/visorbus/       (driver)
>> >>     include/linux/visorbus/  (header files)
>> >> 
>> >> The rationale is that visorbus is dependent on x86-64 architecture.
>> >
>> > What makes it dependent on x86?  What prevents it from running on some
>> > other architecture (not the fact that no one has made such hardware,
>> > just the code reasons please.)
>> 
>> It's dependent on system firmware which is only available on the S-Par
>> platform which is x86_64 only. The closest similarity is probably what
>> you find on the PPC and Sparc platforms.
>
> Ok, but still no need to put it under arch/ anything, it should go in
> drivers/ like all other drivers and busses are, no matter what the arch
> it happens to run on is.

I don't think thats obvious. arch/x86/kvm is an example of this, Sparc
and PPC also have their stuff under arch/.

I am open, if people prefer to have drivers/visorbus I can support that.
I find right now it's really messy with things being put all over the
place, and it's not obvious what the real placement is for all of this.

Jes