[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <12218676.p29ELivsix@wuerfel>
Date: Wed, 18 May 2016 12:52:28 +0200
From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
To: linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Cc: Alexander Graf <agraf@...e.de>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Sinan Kaya <okaya@...eaurora.org>,
Eric Anholt <eric@...olt.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] arm64: Allow for different DMA and CPU bus offsets
On Wednesday 18 May 2016 11:33:01 Alexander Graf wrote:
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/dma-mapping.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/dma-mapping.h
> index ba437f0..67bf8e1 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/dma-mapping.h
> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/dma-mapping.h
> @@ -66,12 +66,16 @@ static inline bool is_device_dma_coherent(struct device *dev)
>
> static inline dma_addr_t phys_to_dma(struct device *dev, phys_addr_t paddr)
> {
> - return (dma_addr_t)paddr;
> + dma_addr_t dev_addr = (dma_addr_t)paddr;
> +
> + return dev_addr - (dma_addr_t)__pfn_to_phys(dev->dma_pfn_offset);
> }
>
> static inline phys_addr_t dma_to_phys(struct device *dev, dma_addr_t dev_addr)
> {
> - return (phys_addr_t)dev_addr;
> + phys_addr_t paddr = (phys_addr_t)dev_addr;
> +
> + return paddr + __pfn_to_phys(dev->dma_pfn_offset);
> }
>
The patch looks ok overall, but I think it's better to use an open-coded
shift instead of __pfn_to_phys/__pfn_to_phys here: those helpers convert
between actual page frame numbers and addresses, which may not always
be a 1:1 relationship, e.g. if someone wants to work around the crazy
"Principles of ARM Memory Maps White Paper" layout.
Arnd
Powered by blists - more mailing lists