linux-kernel - [PATCH v4 5/5] locking/rwsem: Streamline the rwsem_optimistic

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1463534783-38814-6-git-send-email-Waiman.Long@hpe.com>
Date:	Tue, 17 May 2016 21:26:23 -0400
From:	Waiman Long <Waiman.Long@....com>
To:	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Davidlohr Bueso <dave@...olabs.net>,
	Jason Low <jason.low2@...com>,
	Dave Chinner <david@...morbit.com>,
	Peter Hurley <peter@...leysoftware.com>,
	"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Scott J Norton <scott.norton@....com>,
	Douglas Hatch <doug.hatch@....com>,
	Waiman Long <Waiman.Long@....com>
Subject: [PATCH v4 5/5] locking/rwsem: Streamline the rwsem_optimistic_spin() code

This patch moves the owner loading and checking code entirely inside of
rwsem_spin_on_owner() to simplify the logic of rwsem_optimistic_spin()
loop.

Suggested-by: Peter Hurley <peter@...leysoftware.com>
Signed-off-by: Waiman Long <Waiman.Long@....com>
Reviewed-by: Peter Hurley <peter@...leysoftware.com>
---
 kernel/locking/rwsem-xadd.c |   38 ++++++++++++++++++++------------------
 1 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/locking/rwsem-xadd.c b/kernel/locking/rwsem-xadd.c
index e3a7e06..a85a2bd 100644
--- a/kernel/locking/rwsem-xadd.c
+++ b/kernel/locking/rwsem-xadd.c
@@ -332,9 +332,16 @@ done:
 	return ret;
 }
 
-static noinline
-bool rwsem_spin_on_owner(struct rw_semaphore *sem, struct task_struct *owner)
+/*
+ * Return true only if we can still spin on the owner field of the rwsem.
+ */
+static noinline bool rwsem_spin_on_owner(struct rw_semaphore *sem)
 {
+	struct task_struct *owner = READ_ONCE(sem->owner);
+
+	if (!rwsem_owner_is_writer(owner))
+		goto out;
+
 	rcu_read_lock();
 	while (sem->owner == owner) {
 		/*
@@ -354,7 +361,7 @@ bool rwsem_spin_on_owner(struct rw_semaphore *sem, struct task_struct *owner)
 		cpu_relax_lowlatency();
 	}
 	rcu_read_unlock();
-
+out:
 	/*
 	 * If there is a new owner or the owner is not set, we continue
 	 * spinning.
@@ -364,7 +371,6 @@ bool rwsem_spin_on_owner(struct rw_semaphore *sem, struct task_struct *owner)
 
 static bool rwsem_optimistic_spin(struct rw_semaphore *sem)
 {
-	struct task_struct *owner;
 	bool taken = false;
 
 	preempt_disable();
@@ -376,21 +382,17 @@ static bool rwsem_optimistic_spin(struct rw_semaphore *sem)
 	if (!osq_lock(&sem->osq))
 		goto done;
 
-	while (true) {
-		owner = READ_ONCE(sem->owner);
+	/*
+	 * Optimistically spin on the owner field and attempt to acquire the
+	 * lock whenever the owner changes. Spinning will be stopped when:
+	 *  1) the owning writer isn't running; or
+	 *  2) readers own the lock as we can't determine if they are
+	 *     actively running or not.
+	 */
+	while (rwsem_spin_on_owner(sem)) {
 		/*
-		 * Don't spin if
-		 * 1) the owner is a reader as we we can't determine if the
-		 *    reader is actively running or not.
-		 * 2) The rwsem_spin_on_owner() returns false which means
-		 *    the owner isn't running.
+		 * Try to acquire the lock
 		 */
-		if (rwsem_owner_is_reader(owner) ||
-		   (rwsem_owner_is_writer(owner) &&
-		   !rwsem_spin_on_owner(sem, owner)))
-			break;
-
-		/* wait_lock will be acquired if write_lock is obtained */
 		if (rwsem_try_write_lock_unqueued(sem)) {
 			taken = true;
 			break;
@@ -402,7 +404,7 @@ static bool rwsem_optimistic_spin(struct rw_semaphore *sem)
 		 * we're an RT task that will live-lock because we won't let
 		 * the owner complete.
 		 */
-		if (!owner && (need_resched() || rt_task(current)))
+		if (!sem->owner && (need_resched() || rt_task(current)))
 			break;
 
 		/*
-- 
1.7.1