[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160518134406.GI3193@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Wed, 18 May 2016 15:44:06 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Chris Metcalf <cmetcalf@...lanox.com>
Cc: Gilad Ben Yossef <giladb@...hip.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>, Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>,
Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>,
linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, linux-api@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v12 06/13] task_isolation: support
PR_TASK_ISOLATION_STRICT mode
On Tue, Apr 05, 2016 at 01:38:35PM -0400, Chris Metcalf wrote:
> +void task_isolation_interrupt(struct task_struct *task, const char *buf)
> +{
> + siginfo_t info = {};
> + int sig;
> +
> + pr_warn("%s/%d: task_isolation strict mode violated by %s\n",
> + task->comm, task->pid, buf);
> +
So the function name suggests this is called for interrupts, except its
purpose is to deliver a signal.
Now, in case of exceptions the violation isn't necessarily _by_ the task
itself. You might want to change that to report the exception
type/number instead of the affected task.
> + /* Get the signal number to use. */
> + sig = PR_TASK_ISOLATION_GET_SIG(task->task_isolation_flags);
> + if (sig == 0)
> + sig = SIGKILL;
> + info.si_signo = sig;
> +
> + /*
> + * Turn off task isolation mode entirely to avoid spamming
> + * the process with signals. It can re-enable task isolation
> + * mode in the signal handler if it wants to.
> + */
> + task_isolation_set_flags(task, 0);
> +
> + send_sig_info(sig, &info, task);
> +}
Powered by blists - more mailing lists